New Show

http://societydoomed.blogspot.com/

Usov blog

Henceforth, only my new USov blog will be active. It is located here:

http://unitedsov.blogspot.com/

I will post infrequently. If I have something to say, I will travel to the library and post from there.

I will use my audience for the purpose of receiving what I have to say on United Sovereigns of America.

No other communications will occur.

All other blogs will be deleted in one week.

Apparently I'm seeing false positives.

The only thing I can conclude is that no one has been watching my show over the past four years.

If there is anything you want from the typepad site or the blogger site, please get it. I will be deleting those blogs within one week.

I do not receive television signals at my house. And I will be terminating the internet service within one week. So I won't be seeing anyone's TV show or reading anyone's column. Since I won't have DSL, there will be no need to have a telephone as I place few calls. I will disconnect the phone at the same time.

I'm getting on with my life, which does not include stand-up, which I regard as a most unfortunate waste of my time.

I will grow my garden and raise my chickens and watch your society implode. (By 2010 you WILL see people eating each other. I will laugh.) I have discharged my moral obligation: I diagnosed the problem, I learned stand-up for the purpose of telling you about it, I proposed a workable solution, and I offered to implement it for you.

No one seems to care.

So I don't care.

I rarely collect my mail, so it generally gets sent back as undeliverable.

In one week, the only way my audience will be able to contact me and ask me to continue is to send flowers to my physical address, which is 10 Rockingham Post Rd., Rockingham, VT 05101.

In the absence of some explicit request to continue, I will attempt to forget that I ever engaged in this colossal waste of my time.

Fine.

I'll be sitting in a seat at Penn Station should anyone wish to find me. (Which no one will.)

I am not even going to waste the money on a hotel room.

This show is over. This non-career is over. You are all instructed to leave.

I can't stand a single one of you.

You make me sick. Your nation is dead, your city is dead, and your society is dead.

Good riddance to each and every last one of you.

I can't believe that I invested so much in this waste.

Chris out.

I would very much like it if someone would come talk to me.

Even just to tell me to get lost? Please? Or reply to my twitter thing at user ckpi?

If I don't hear from anyone, I will leave the Dunkin Donuts at 10:15 pm and find a cheap hotel somewhere and then return to Vermont in the morning. And you will never hear from me again. This colossal waste of five years of my life will finally be over.

Why will no one talk to me?

Please tell me that not every last thing in this world is a disappointment.

The collaborative energy that comes out of working in a group environment has always been intoxicating for you, and today you'll get another sweet taste of it. People are coming to your aid without you even asking for their help, and it feels good to be part of the brotherhood of man. This goodwill will grow throughout the day, helping you connect with someone who typically rubs you the wrong way. Old arguments can finally be put to rest forever.

--Yahoo horoscope for the day

Please don't let me perceive my perceptions to be erroneous. You can't know how much it would mean to me to be let in from the cold.

I even brought presents.

I have Vermonter-y stuff like maple syrup and moose-adorned coffee mugs and stuff.

When do I get invited into the club?

Test

test

Well, your hospitality leaves something to be desired.

No one was at the train station to meet me. I have nowhere to go.

I am at the Dunkin Donuts at 8th Ave and W 37th St.

"Chris, don't you have a backup plan?"

Not everything has to be planned till it hurts.

Would someone please come get me? Or twitter me back at user ckpi.

Thank You,
Your Lover, Chris King

P.S. I have to go Number Two. (Bad.)

Until tomorrow, then.

"He's got murder on his mind."

"Sorry, folks, just one more piece before I pack up my wireless mic and my set list."

"You should know that some cars in the parking lot have been broken into. Be careful when you leave tonight."

"Also be advised that the bankers who commissioned 9-11 appear to have commissioned a bio-terror attack involving H5N1 Avian Flu."

"If you work in law enforcement or the military, you should know that you have performed your compartmentalized function well, but the system's need of you is very nearly over. One of these bankers' front operations, Baxter Pharmaceutical, mixed H5N1 with this year's H3N2 seasonal flu virus, failed to kill the viruses --which procedure is part of manufacturing any vaccine-- and then shipped it out. They were hoping that one of the recipients of this vaccine would function as an incubator for a reconfigured H5N1 that transmits easily between humans, as H3N2 does."

"You should be aware that an H5N1 bio-terror attack appears to be imminent."

"Let me reiterate, and I cannot state it more gravely: A vaccine company appears to have deliberately mixed a deadly cocktail for the purpose of reducing the human population by some seventy-five percent."

"If you work within this system and you somehow thought that you were a valued member of the club, you are not. You are regarded by your bosses as dispensable."

"The Sociopath is at work."

This is a FLASH-level warning to all law enforcement. Listen to and read all the following:

http://www.prisonplanet.com/accidental-contamination-of-vaccine-with-live-avian-flu-virus-virtually-impossible.html

Here is a relevant portion of Alex Jones' show on the matter:







Here is a link to the entire four-hour show, from which the above videos are excerpted:

http://rss.nfowars.net/20090305_Thu_Alex.mp3

"Ahm ya huckleberry..."

Hello, Non-Allied Military Elements.

How are you?

Are you defending freedom? From your latest ad campaign, I see that you are.



I like race cars and rock n' roll, too.

I see that you're looking for a few American Warriors to defend liberty.

Now, to be fair to you, this campaign came straight from Madison Avenue. (They don't even know that Kid Rock is a nobody. Wrong choice.)

Also to be fair to you, you operate within a compartmentalized system. Everyone has their job to do, and very few know what their efforts work to achieve.

You are aware that the nation was conquered. It almost no longer even exists. The bankers who commissioned Mossad, CIA, and your own Pentagon to execute 9-11 have worked assiduously to dismantle the Constitution as an impediment to their business activities.

You are legally obligated, by virtue of your oath of office, to defend that Constitution against all enemies.

I require your assistance when I reclaim New York. Everyone gets to live up to their advertising: Journalists get to be journalists for once, lawmen get to be lawmen, and American Warriors like yourselves get to defend freedom.

I will claim credit for hatching this scheme five years ago. I went through my notes last night and found the following entry, dated September 5, 2003:

"Learn standup. Tactically difficult to engage comedian. Become skilled enough to achieve informational primacy. Use one-to-many distribution model to coordinate counterattack."

Though I employ humor as a vehicle, this operation itself is not a joke. I require your assistance. I require guys with guns, I require pressure on Israel, and I require the disabling of satellite transponders and whatever else I may request.

You will perform your advertised function. You will defend liberty, you will defend the Constitution, and you will be an American Warrior.

And don't forget: If anything happens to me, my audiences --both present and future-- are going to be very much interested to know why you permitted your lesser to die doing your job.

Alan Parsons Project - Pipeline

Required Viewing for this Course

When you understand that inside jobs are as natural as sunshine,

you will want to develop the means of spotting them. To spot them, let's watch this video, which goes through a few in recent memory. The presenter focuses on false-flag terror as a means of launching wars. The tactic may also be used to steal your rights, your property, your energy --which is the end goal of all wars anyway.

You may consider "inside job" to be synonymous with "false-flag terror."

And don't forget: Narratives get sold just like soap powder. I operate from a contrarian view of politics. What that means is that since narratives get sold like any other product, and since the advertising for a narrative will be targeted at the broadest audience --the middle portion of the bell curve-- that means that --assuming that the advertising is effective-- that what most people believe is the result of that advertising. According to the contrarian view of politics, what most people believe is not what is true. Therefore, I can look at what most people believe, provisionally define that belief as incorrect, and then go looking elsewhere for the truth. In investigations, discerning the truth is aided by first knowing what is not true. I keep an eye on opinion polls so that I may know what most people believe. I may then use that knowledge to guess what the narrative-pushing advertising is, and I may then construct synthetic data points. (A synthetic data point is not a piece of hard data, but rather one that is synthesized by inference.)

In entertaining any Truth Commission,

I will remind you that you will get no justice out of the Justice Department. It is fully controlled by the sociopaths who commissioned the dismantling of lawful government and the conquering of your nation.

Eric Holder is not relevant to any fruitful proceeding. Ignore him.

I don't know whether this was an inside job or not,

only because I haven't followed it because it's not central to what I'm doing right now.

The mainstream media has embraced suggestions of an “inside job”, as evidence continues to mount that Tuesday’s attack on the Sri Lankan cricket team was a carefully staged event, rather than a hit and run strike.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/pakistan-cricket-attack-inside-job-theory-goes-viral.html

My conceptual model of politics is built from a number of assumptions, a few of which are these:

• The human organism will seek to maximize its extraction of energy from its environment so that, one, it may sustain itself and, two, so that it may provide for as many offspring as possible.
• In a state of nature, an organism has a claim to whatever resources it may be able to secure/defend. (It is only with a social union that private property rights are recognized, defendable by the actions of the group as a whole.)
• Therefore, I might expect that the taking of resources --labeled as "theft" within a system of human law-- is a natural inclination. Theft is natural.
  
• If theft is natural, then the operations of men tend toward theft. They tend to the taking of resources which may be secured. Theft abounds.

So if theft abounds, I will examine the actions of men in the knowledge that humans are hardwired to steal. It is a natural inclination. And for the purposes of this discussion, I regard theft as amoral. I infuse the word with no moral meaning.

• Theft involves taking from another.
• One always seeks to minimize cost of action and to maximize return on action.
• Therefore, all else being equal, one will always seek to trick another into giving what one seeks to steal. Trickery can often be the most cost-effective means of achieving theft.
• Therefore, I might expect trickery to abound.

So if trickery abounds, I will examine the actions of men in the knowledge that, all else being equal, they are inclined to trick. (For the purposes of this discussion, I have zeroed-out any influence of human law, codified in various religions. All law derives from religion. Some religions prohibit theft, some reserve it. Since I cannot know the religion of a particular actor, I cannot make any assumptions about its influence on that actor.)

So when I regard any event, I ask myself, "Where's the theft, where's the trickery?"

• Theft abounds.
• Slavery is the ultimate form of theft. No need to repeatedly sneak up on another and steal his wallet when you can put a chain around his neck and force him to toil for you.
• Therefore, slavery abounds.

Indeed, slavery is the natural state of mankind. All else being equal, outside the consideration of any moral or legal code, one is hardwired to enslave another. Attempts at enslavement are as natural as sunshine. Someone on this train, if he could get away with it, would like to enslave me.

So since theft abounds, and since attempts at enslavement abound, and since trickery is often the most cost-effective means of securing what one wants, I may rest assured that someone would likely employ trickery in enslaving me, in capturing me physically so that I cannot get away. When Ted Bundy captured those women he enslaved and/or murdered, he did it by employing a ruse. He wore a fake cast on his arm and then asked some passing, pretty girl for help bundling a package into the trunk of his car or whatever. Then he hit her over the head with his cast.

I saw that Mel Gibson movie, Apocalypto. I highly recommend it. In it, the Aztecs or whoever they were captured the members of other tribes and tied them all to a long pole in such a manner that they could all walk under their own power, yet still remain captured. They were marched through the rainforest, off to be sacrificed or to be sold as slaves.

Methods change. Human nature does not. So when I regard any event, I ask myself, "Where's the long pole?"

In modern societies, we don't use long poles and vines to tie people to them. We use political systems. Men with powdered wigs and guys with guns and liens and lawsuits and all the rest. Most of the operations of modern political systems are geared to tying populations to a long pole.

• Rights are property.
• Liberty is a right.
• Theft abounds.
• Therefore, theft of rights abounds.

Put another way, liberty is the opposite of slavery. Since someone is always looking to enslave me, this means that someone is always looking to steal my liberty.

So when I regard any event, I always ask myself, "Where is the theft of liberty here? Where is the pole that steals my ability to get away?"

How does one trick another? The trickster will exploit natural human needs in achieving his end. I would suggest that the human trickster would naturally employ a guide, such as that explicated by Maslow in his Hierarchy of Needs:


What this means is that, at his most fundamental, a human desires food and shelter. Five minutes after he has secured his basic needs, he will seek to secure his physical safety. And then after that he will seek to secure the "nice to have" stuff, such as a sense of self-worth, purpose, love, etc.

The point is, if you can exploit one's desire for basic needs and physical security, you can exploit that person. You can enslave him. If I threaten your supply of food, I control you. If I threaten your physical security, I control you.

It is as natural as sunshine that one would seek to steal from me by threatening my physical security.

Therefore, whenever I regard a threat to my security --bombs going off, people getting shot, planes flying into buildings-- I ask myself, "Who here is threatening my physical security in an effort to enslave me through trickery?"

And we can see the result of the Patriot Act. It does absolutely nothing to defend me from Mossad and the CIA. What it does achieve is a stealing of my rights. It steals my property. The piece of legislation is nothing but a long pole.

Everyone in my audience knows that 9-11 was an inside job. I don't mean to say that the DMV lady was in on it. When I say "inside job," I mean that someone from inside the tribe threw a bomb to make it look like the tribe was being attacked from outside. He threatened the physical security of the tribe for the purpose of tricking me into delivering to him what he seeks to steal: my property, my energy.

Inside jobs are as natural as sunshine. You will find them everywhere. They go back to the beginnings of human societies. They are the oldest trick in the book. They are a means of manipulating populations for the purpose of extracting energy from them. They are a means of theft.

The following events were inside jobs:

• The Shoah
• The Oklahoma City Bombing
  
• 9-11
• The anthrax attacks
• The London bombings
• The Madrid bombings
• The Mumbai massacre

You may examine the evidence if you wish. A detailing of that evidence is beyond the scope of this piece.

Inside jobs are the rule, rather than the exception.

So in the absence of any information, my immediate inclination is to treat an event as an inside job. Knowing nothing about this Sri Lankan cricket team thing, I would operate from that assumption.

And I will add that the term "conspiracy theory" is a linguistic warfare term. It is a word that has no meaning until infused with emotional meaning which is then applied to a target. If you were to ask your local District Attorney how many of his pending cases are conpiracies, I'd guess he'd say somewhere in the vicinity of twenty five percent. Conspiracies abound. They are as natural as sunshine. And as I've said, some people don't like conspiracy theories --namely, those involved in conspiracies.

Ring in the Cash

Remember "Dow 36,000," the 1999 bestseller that promised a "wealth explosion" as the stock market scaled ever higher? Its author, Jim Glassman, went back to his only-in-Washington career as a financial columnist, media executive, technology maven, think tank scholar and, most recently, Bush administration point man in the global war of ideas. As for the Dow, well, we where that went. Glassman sat down with Outlook's Carlos Lozada to explain why Barack Obama will disappoint the world's expectations, why al-Qaeda doesn't get the Internet, and why he still thinks the Dow will hit 36,000 -- he's just not saying when.

...

[Question:] But you don't feel the need to apologize to someone that read your book, went in and got creamed?

[Answer:] Absolutely not.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/04/AR2009030403455_2.html?sid=ST2009030502993

Think tank scholar.

When the day comes for me to be on TV and they put that graphic on the screen that tells the audience who they're looking at and what his claim to fame is, here are some recommended titles for me:

• Man About Town
• Bon Vivant
• Creator, BumBum Pants! The Musical
• Celeb
• Shipping Magnate
• You Know Who
• Think Tank Scholar

I think I went to college with Mister Glassman. Yes, I'm certain of it. He was the guy to my left in economics class who remained resolutely opposed to blowing his brains out and storming off in a huff. He obviously went on to get a degree and infect the minds of impressionable housewives everywhere about how they could rise above their stations and claim their birthright as racers of thoroughbred horses.

Why, I bet Mister Glassman doesn't even know that economic --that is, informational-- transactions occur in higher dimensions.

And his thinking having tanked, he's absolutely not going to apologize to those who lost their savings relying on his "financial" advice, while those who relied on mine made 300% on their money over the past ten years. My Nobel-worthy insight? All fiat currencies fail, which is what has happened to the "dollar," the Federal Reserve Note, Moloch Money ("In God we trust!"), since it no longer is the world's reserve currency.)

When Mister Glassman writes his next book, I suggest that he consult with the Vermont Lottery Commission in picking a title. They've got it down to a science with their scratch-off lottery ticket games. Fistful of Fifties!, Cash Blast, Casino Riches

Itinerary

Train 55 departs Bellows Falls Monday March 9 at 11:56am, arrives Penn Station 6:41pm.

Your city is yours if you want it. If not, I'll just leave.

I need something.

When I come to New York, I need a cell phone or other handheld device that lets me take a video and upload it to my blog. Essentially a camera phone that does video. Preferably one that integrates seamlessly with some blog service. I want to be able to video things and send the video off with the push of a button.

I see we're having trouble drumming up support for this proposed Truth Commission.

I don't actually care about it. I know all I need to know. I know full well what has occurred in those torture chambers. I know that children have been raped by interrogators. I know that subjects have been sodomized with acid-soaked rods. Under Mister Yoo's crack counsel, these things are considered legal because they do not cause organ failure or death. I consider these things illegal because they are disgusting. They are moral outrages. And what has become lost on so many people is that the sole function of law is to codify moral imperatives. You don't steal. You don't murder. And you don't videotape children being raped. That is why I completely ignore all other jurisdictions: Their laws really have very little to do with promoting moral imperatives and everything to do with securing the material concerns of special interests.

I've grown so weary of arguing against torture. It is amazing to me that it's even open to discussion. Torture has one function only, and that is to bring pain to another. Torture is sadism. Sociopaths like to torture people. The thing, the rationale, the true reason. Torture is sold for the purpose of making it possible for sociopaths to express their sickness unfettered by the constraints of law. Sociopaths always gravitate to positions of power. They delight in exercising power over others. And they always overrun government. Tyranny --which has come to this land, and which promises only eternal, soul-crushing misery for your children-- may be defined as the rule of the sociopath. The United States government is firmly in the control of sociopaths. This is not hyperbole. This is a dispassionate assessment based on a study of history. Your society has collapsed because no one will stand against tyrannical sociopathy.

I am a man out of time. I exist in some other age. I exist in some idealized world where torture is simply not okay. I exist in an age where decent men hunt down criminals, try them, and put them to death.

Heinous crimes have taken place in your midst, right in front of you. You are morally obligated to attend to them. You have moral responsibilities that must be discharged. It is not optional. The decent man is morally compelled to resist sociopaths. The entire history of mankind is nothing but a struggle of the properly functioning human against the predations of the sociopath. It's always something. It is an eternal struggle. It will never end. Every generation finds itself with its test, its opportunity to square its shoulder against the spread of lawlessness and savagery. Future generations expect the discharge of your duty and they will curse your cowardice if you neglect it.

The real value of this Truth Commission is not necessarily that we will uncover things that we don't already know. It is that we demonstrate to all that we do not tolerate sociopathic, sadistic behavior. It indicates to all who may examine this society the nature of our moral code. What is moral? Moral is that which promotes a felicitous behavior among men. It is that which promotes a properly functioning human society. Permitting sadistic sociopaths to walk free is immoral; it is a normalizing of degeneracy.

When a moral imperative presents itself, no other considerations apply. All else just gets shunted off the books. Your re-election is not relevant. How you will appear in the news media is not relevant. When a moral imperative presents itself, you take off your politician hat and you put on your statesman hat.

Why do you think there are so many uniquely unqualified people running around these days playing statesman? It's because it's an open field. There's no competition. How do you lose?

I have removed myself from your political union and your society. I am not of you. If no action is taken to bring these criminals to justice, do not ever claim an association with me. I will not be seen in public with the town rapist.

And I know that my political choices have placed me in some great legal jeopardy of other jurisdictions. I don't care. I could die tommorrow and I would do so with a smile on my face, content in the knowledge that I stood for something.

I would rather be destroyed by your degenerate society than to be judged complicit with it.

However you slice it, I win.

THANK you! Whooooo!!!!!!

I called it!!!!

The last month collision of Russian and US satellites may have been intentionally manipulated by Washington, says a Russian ex-official.

Former head of Russia's military space intelligence, major general Leonid Shershner told the daily Moskovski Komsomolez on Tuesday that the US Iridium 33 satellite involved in the collision was part of a US military research project launched in 2007.

The dual-purpose project -- Orbital Express -- mentioned by the former official aims to create a new technology that supports a broad range of future US national security and commercial space programs.

The project, Shershner said, was expected to allow the US to intercept and manipulate "hostile satellites" and destroy them from an earth-bound command center.

According to the general, the collision that occurred on Feb. 10 could have been easily avoided since the Iridium 33 was equipped with a navigation system able to detect any targets that move toward it, send information to earth and allow the ground center to change its orbit.

Unfortunately, such preventive measures did not occur, Shershner added.

http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=87474&sectionid=351020602

My stink detector is calibrated perfectly!

That phone call I just placed?

That was to a local coin dealer inquiring about selling a few Maple Leafs so that I can pay the mortgage and pre-pay it for a couple of months since no one paid off my mortgage like they were supposed to. Completely on the up and up. (The phone call, not the audience.)

And I also placed a call to the local oil company to get some oil put in the tank --since obviously I can't burn wood while I am in New York. And those other calls were just pillow talk and sweet nothings.

So that's my communications log for the day. As you were.

Lightning Seeds

New Yorkers:

Have you constructed my command and control system yet? It is comprised of labor unions, electricity, communications, water. I want to power it up as soon as I arrive.

Who's the mayor there? Bloomberg? I like him; he's a real pisser. He hates criminals just like I do. I'm sure he's down with what I'm doing. "Hello, Future People, thanks for watching my Behind the Music movie. I'm here with Mayor Bloomberg. Say, mayor, I'm here to arrest my --I mean, our-- 9-11 criminals. You're completely down with that, right?"

My first priority to is to gain control of the inter-bank clearance system and the New York Stock Exchange. It is necessary to loosening control of the United States from foreign banking interests, the ones who attacked this nation on 9-11.

When I was in the Navy, I would occasionally be tasked with assisting some other command with their technical problems, some broke ship in port somewhere. My division officer would say, "Pack your seabag, King, you're going to Hong Kong."

Upon my arrival, I fully expected to be picked up at the airport and driven to the ship, and to be granted access to whatever technicians and tools I needed.

I provide the moral authority. You provide the command structure. Everyone plays their role.

...and when it's fixed we all go out for drinks.

...no, silly, not on me...

Required Viewing.

This is about the FBI-sanctioned citizens' group called Infragard. Essentially, it is a collection of curtain twitchers who snitch for the FBI by reporting on Terra threats. (The fat white guy who grouses about the government while riding his lawn mower.) It is also reported that Infragard members have been granted by the FBI the authority to shoot to kill in defense of national infrastructure, again, ostensibly against the threats posed by imaginary Terris. (We've so very many self-important people running around waving claims of authority that the farmer with a shotgun does not, alas, recognize. You've only got one half of the equation, boys.)

I'm not sure how Infragard could defend me against Mossad and CIA flying planes into the World Trade Center.

Let's use some deductive reasoning:

• I have determined within a reasonable doubt that compartmentalized elements of Mossad and CIA executed 9-11, with the collusion of the Vice President and elements of the FBI.
• I am not smarter than the Government Man.
• I do not have access to better intelligence than the Government Man.
• Therefore, the Government Man knows that 9-11 was executed by compartmentalized elements of Mossad and CIA.
• Therefore, Infragard is useless in protecting me from Terriss, as are the various torture programs and eavesdropping programs and the like.
• The Government Man is intelligent. He knows that these programs are useless for their stated function.
• But the Government Man still pushes these programs as being useful.
• Therefore, the Government Man is knowingly employing them to achieve some other end.
• That end is theft, a theft of my property, my liberty. Liberty is the opposite of slavery.
• The United States is actively engaged in enslaving me on behalf of business interests.
  

Obviously, Infragard needs to disappear.

And I like how all these organizations sound like they were named by twelve-year-old boys playing cops and robbers. "Infragard! Doot di-doo! We're guarding the infrastructure! Get it?! Kinda like 'Ho Ho Ho I'm Santa Claus and I'm a pimp!'"

How's this for a complementary organization:

FedKill

"There's my boy! Little Johnny, come here and sit on Mama's lap. Look everyone! Johnny's home! Now, Johnny, I know you're not gonna disappoint yo' mama... Tell us: How many United States agents did you kneel down in the street and kill today? Hmm? It's all good! It's cool now! We're bringin' cool back to governmint! Because you know that they accidentally made it not only morally permissible but a moral imperative to liquidate them as a clear and present danger to a republican form of government! Do you know what that is? Do you know what 'republican form of government' means? It's where you're s'posed to follow the law and everything, and if people run around with tin badges wantin' to look up yer asshole and feel your titties and make you jerk off, you just put a bullet in their head and kick 'em into a ditch and be done with it! It's all good! It's somethin' I can be proud to tell Mabel and D'Neesha down at the corner. 'Mah Johnny killed me eight feds yesterday! And he ain't gonna get in no trouble because it's cool now! Yeah, then some guy from the FBI branch office came around to investigate the killin's but we followed him home and drug him out at midnight and hung him from the neck till dead and we burned down his house! Problem solved!' ...Now, Johnny, you get right back out there and kill me some feds!"

If you are a United States agent and if you were at a cocktail party, how would you even argue with a straight face that you should not be shot down in the street like some crazed, rabid dog?

The Christian Church is a diseased, siphilitic whore.

A shocking document has come to light from a church in Ohio which educates its congregation that Barack Obama’s presidency is appointed by God and that Obama himself is “God’s minister,” in another perversion of Romans 13, the bible verse cited as an excuse for Christians not to oppose tyranny.

Ohio District Superintendent Rev. John Wooton was responsible for distributing the pamphlet, which was handed out at the Assembly of God church in Ohio, according to a reader who forwarded the document to us. Click here for the PDF file.

“This was handed out at the Assembly of God church that my fiance and I used to attend. We immediately stopped attending after getting this flier about ’submitting to Obama and the government,’ states the reader.

...

The document cites Romans 13 verses 1-4 and claims that the following “paraphrases” can be interpreted from the bible.

- Barack Obama’s presidency is appointed by God. (v 1)

- Christians should lead the way in supporting Barack Obama’s presidency. (v 2)

- Barack Obama’s presidency can be a force for good and a deterrent against evil. (v 3)

- As president, Barack Obama is God’s minister to you for good. (v 4)

...

Romans 13 has routinely been cited by tyrants throughout history in an attempt to prevent Christians from opposing their rule, indeed, it was Hitler’s favorite bible verse. Religious groups such as the Catholics in 1930’s Germany also used the verse as an excuse not to rise up against the Nazis when they were still a minority political party.

...

Ominously. as we first exposed in 2006, FEMA is training pastors and other religious representatives to become secret police enforcers who teach their congregations to “obey the government” in preparation for a declaration of martial law, property and firearm seizures, and forced relocation. The bible verse that FEMA encourages religious representatives to cite while undertaking this role? Romans 13.

The individual who forwarded the document noted that around the time the sermon was given, the church seemed to have an influx of funds.

“This church has a new stage with flat screen monitors, updated church vans, and is talking about expanding the church by building a new church, which all occurred around the giving of this sermon. Mind you, we were having a hard time buying new chairs for our church, no more than a year ago. Coincidence?” he writes.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/church-document-encourages-congregation-to-obey-government.html

Guaranteed: This pastor received money from FEMA, not just to trick out his church, but to line his own pockets. He is an agent of the state, which penetrated the Church long ago.

At best, useless. At worst, dangerous.

And you won't. He's a fake.

As reported last month, one of Obama’s first actions in office was to sign an executive order securing the continued practice of secretly capturing, transporting and imprisoning so called “enemy combatants”.

Under executive orders issued by Obama just two days into his tenure, the CIA still has authority to carry out what are known as renditions, secret abductions and transfers of prisoners to countries that cooperate with the United States, the Los Angeles Times reported.

“The Obama administration appears to have determined that the rendition program was one component of the Bush administration’s war on terrorism that it could not afford to discard.” Greg Miller noted.

A minor provision within one executive order states that instructions to close the CIA’s secret prisons “do not refer to facilities used only to hold people on a short-term, transitory basis”, meaning that some “black sites” can remain open.

Though former CIA officials have admitted that rendition is mostly unproductive, an administration official told the LA Times anonymously: “Obviously you need to preserve some tools — you still have to go after the bad guys. The legal advisors working on this looked at rendition. It is controversial in some circles and kicked up a big storm in Europe. But if done within certain parameters, it is an acceptable practice.”

As we further illuminated in our previous report, Obama’s much lauded declaration to “ban” torture and his “commitment” to close down detention facilities is full of loopholes and hidden clauses designed to allow such practices and premises to be continued, albeit with renewed secrecy.

If Obama were truly committed to ending the legacy of torture and secret detention, he would authorize the prosecution of those officials responsible, all the way up to the top. Instead, he , along with his CIA Director Leon Panetta, has said he will do no such thing.

Indeed, the latest sign of allowing such crimes to go unpunished comes in the form of federal prosecutor John Durham signaling that even though he has yet to complete his investigation, he is unlikely to indict any CIA employees for incinerating 92 secret interrogation tapes that purportedly show suspects being waterboarded.

Furthermore, we have not seen Obama repeal Patriot Acts I and II, nor have we seen a reversal of Bush’s signing statement that would effectively repeal the John Warner Defense Authorization Act.

We have not seen any evidence to suggest that the NSA will cease warrantless secret surveillance and phone-taps of American citizens.

We have not seen any deviation from the Bush-era war on terror policies.

We have not seen any CHANGE.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/terror-memos-reveal-total-destruction-of-us-constitutional-freedoms.html

Mister Obama, don't get comfortable. I am very close to ejecting you from my theater.

I don't allow trash here.

Allied Military Elements:

I assure you that as things heat up, Israelis will attempt to detonate a nuclear, biological, or radiological weapon in an American city. Being in the losing position that they are, they will strike in this manner.

If there is any attack on an American city, terminate the Israeli government and military command structure. Then we'll invite their Arab neighbors to reclaim that land in whatever manner seems most appropriate to them.

You drew first blood. We responded. Game over. Walk away from the board or leave in a body bag. Your choice.

Lawyers:

Prepare papers providing for the arrest and trial of Michael Mukasey for the crime of abetting terrorists. (He ran legal interference for the Israelis involved in the first WTC bombing.)

Flip him.

Lawyers:

Prepare papers providing for the arrest and trial of Michael Chertoff for the crime of abetting terrorists. (All those Israelis who were arrested immediately after 9-11 were released by him and returned to Israel for visa violations.)

Flip him.

Lawyers:

Prepare papers providing for the arrest and trial of Henry Paulson. The charge? Threatening the United States with financial terrorism. (He told Congressmen that there would be martial law if they did not pass the shakedown bill.)

Flip him.

The old ways will be just fine, thanks.

The New York Times has launched an experimental network of websites providing local community news and information for residents of neighborhoods in New York and New Jersey.

The newspaper said the online project, dubbed "The Local," is "part of an exploration by The Times of ways to extend its journalistic values to serve and engage audiences in new ways."

http://rawstory.com/news/afp/NY_Times_launches_local_websites_ne_03022009.html

You can't even cover the biggest mass murder in American history that occurred just down the street. And now you want to try your hand at reporting on stuff going on in New Jersey?

Aren't you out of business yet? When can we finally bury that snaggle-toothed old crone?

Get lost. You're just stinking up the place. You're absorbing ad revenue that could be going to news organizations.

Good riddance. Fakes.

This is what you get when attorneys practice law.

In the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, the Justice Department secretly gave the green light for the U.S. military to attack apartment buildings and office complexes inside the United States, deploy high-tech surveillance against U.S. citizens and potentially suspend First Amendment freedom-of-the-press rights in order to combat the terror threat, according to a memo released Monday.

Many of the actions discussed in the Oct. 23, 2001, memo to then White House counsel Alberto Gonzales and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld's chief lawyer, William Haynes, were never actually taken.

But the memo from the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel—along with others made public for the first time Monday—illustrates with new details the extraordinary post-9/11 powers asserted by Bush administration lawyers. Those assertions ultimately led to such controversial policies as allowing the waterboarding of terror suspects and permitting warrantless wiretapping of U.S. citizens—steps that remain the subject of ongoing investigations by Congress and the Justice Department. The memo was co-written by John Yoo, at the time a deputy attorney general in the Office of Legal Counsel. Yoo, now a professor at the Boalt Hall School of Law at the University of California, Berkeley, has emerged as one of the central figures in those ongoing investigations.

http://www.newsweek.com/id/187342

These legal technicians somehow came to believe that they could just jury-rig things so that entire, inconvenient portions of the Constitution would go away. Yoo is very much like Rahm Emanuel in this respect, who thinks that a no-fly list is sufficient to do away with the 2nd Amendment. (I don't know where he went to law school. The Rahm Emanuel Strip-Mall School of Adult Educations for the Active Adult Lifestyle. Psst!: [loud, strained whisper] I think he practices some other kind of law!!!)

And by the way, if your political inclination had ever led you to think that guns should be banned and that we should do away with the 2nd Amendment, do you now see why it is necessary that the people keep guns? Do you now see the value of the 2nd Amendment? It's so that when all the legal technicians have had their fill of mucking up the works and magically doing away with fundamental law, the people can just say, "Wow. We're happy that you folks think that you have all these new powers. So we're gonna remove ourselves from your monster baby and form a new political union to defend ourselves from your new creation. ...Oh: If y'all ever come around trying to assert your conception of law, we'll drop you where you stand."

If it were not for the estimated one hundred million persons in this land who are willing, able, and equipped to defend themselves and their lawful government, you'd be in a concentration camp by now. The only thing preventing the Pentagon from lowering the hammer for their banker masters is the knowledge that they'll get their clocks cleaned. (Again, they can't prevail against rice farmers and goat herders. And this is something that they are aware of.)

This will go down in history as the most boneheaded move ever: What caused the United States to lose the ability to enforce a parking ticket? The loss of due process. See, the United States somehow came to believe that it had the authority to label anyone an enemy combatant and spirit that person off to be tortured and killed. This designation of enemy combatant is secret. Therefore, the man on the street cannot know if a United States agent wants merely to collect on a parking ticket or if he intends to torture and kill him without trial. Therefore, the reasonable person has every moral right to immediately neutralize any United States agent who so much as reaches for a pair of handcuffs.

Smooth move. I think it's funny how you destroyed your own ability to enforce your laws. It's like the snake eating its own tail. Yum yum munch munch Bloop! Now it's gone. Extinguished like a micro black hole produced in John Yoo's Linear Accelerator of Legal Genius.

The United States accidentally publicly stated that it is morally proper to use all most minimally effective degrees of force, up to and including lethal force, to prevent being taken into custody by its agents.

What would Ephraim Zimbalist, Junior think?

He would probably recommend that no lawyer be permitted to practice law.

Barack Obama does not work for you.

As I detailed over the weekend, the Obama administration -- in the case brought by two American lawyers and their charity-client claiming that their conversations were illegally intercepted by the Bush administration -- has announced that it intends to try to appeal, yet again, in order to prevent the court from hearing the lawsuit. On Friday, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Obama's request to stay the District Judge's Order, which had held that it will review a classified document that the plaintiffs claim proves they were subjected to the illegal eavesdropping (thus conferring standing on the plaintiffs to challenge the legality of Bush's NSA program), and also ordered the Obama administration to provide security clearances to the plaintiffs' lawyers so that they could review the document as well. The Obama DOJ immediately announced they intend to try to appeal again -- the third time, since Obama's Inauguration, that the Obama DOJ will try to argue before a court that the case should not heard at all.

In the meantime, though, the Obama DOJ is now refusing to comply with the Judge's order, actually arguing to the court that only the President can decide whether classified information can be used in a court proceeding, and that courts have no power to make such decisions.

...

As Marcy Wheeler documents in detail, the Obama DOJ is now spouting the Cheney/Addington view of government in its purest and most radical expression. Citing lengthy excepts from the Obama DOJ's brief filed on Friday following its loss in the appeals court -- a brief that could easily have been written by John Yoo or David Addington in its distinctly un-American and anti-constitutional theories purporting to vest unchallengeable, unreviewable power in the President -- Wheeler writes:

This whole passage, read in the context of the wholesale rollback on Executive claims to have exclusive control over classified information just reeks of desperation. Not to mention an acceptance of Cheney's contention that we have fewer than one--or even two--branches of government.

http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/03/02/executive_power/index.html

Conceptual Model vs. Data.

A conceptual model is a framework into which we plug data in order for them to make sense. For example, if I were to speak the following words to you, unless you possessed the proper conceptual model, you would not know what I was saying:

"Four-eight. Four-five. Four-charlie. Four-charlie. Four-foxtrot. Two echo."

The data appear meaningless to you unless you possess the proper conceptual model, which is that I am speaking in the computer code known as ASCII, and in hexadecimal in particular. I just said "Hello."

The term "conceptual model" could almost be considered to be synonymous with "assumption." If I operate from the assumption that you are in the habit of speaking in hexadecimal ASCII, I will interpret everything you say as an ASCII utterance. But maybe you don't speak in ASCII all the time and you neglect to inform me of this. So I might hear you say some things and then I would interpret it as:

"Pancake chainsaw peepee happytime." If it made no sense to me, I would figure that it was beyond my comprehension, that it was just pure brilliance.

So when people see Barack Obama installing Republicans into key administration positions, they may not understand it. "Well, Mister Fellow Democrat, I don't understand why he's doing it either. It's bi-partisanship, or maybe he's keeping his friends close and his enemies closer. Whatever it is, it's pure brilliance."

It's not that it's pure brilliance that is beyond your comprehension. It's that you are interpreting the data without the correct conceptual model. Nothing in this world is beyond your understanding. If something does not make sense to you, it is because you are attempting to plug the data into the wrong conceptual model.

Now. Remember how I said that a conceptual model is almost synonymous with an assumption? People usually don't think logically. They usually discard non-fitting data rather than switching conceptual models. Never discard data. Do not forget that.

Consider the following data:

• Pyroclastic flows of molten steel drip from Tower 1.
• Blast squibs jet from Tower 1.
• Maintenance guy hears a massive explosion and sees fire in the basement of Tower 1.
• Terriss later turn up alive and well, surprised to hear that they are dead.
• Seismographs record events with the signature of demolitions charges just prior to building collapse.
  

Which conceptual model do these data fit?

1. The Astro-Genital Brigade flew planes into the WTC and then the buildings defied the laws of physics and blowed up and fell right down. Why did AGB do this? They hate us so much that they gave us the finger and everything so that we would attack them and poison their land with depleted uranium.
2. Bankers needed that pig of an office complex gone like yesterday and they also wanted to launch a war in the Middle East, so they wired that abortion up with demolitions charges and got their hirelings in Mossad and CIA to fly airplanes into it.
   

If you choose to consider every last data point, there is only one conceptual model into which they fit.

But most people don't do this. They pick and choose among data until they find the data that support their conceptual model.

So here is how you solve a mystery:

1. Assemble all known data. Discard none of it.
2. Spread all your data out on the floor until it makes sense. The resulting pattern is your conceptual model. It is the "code."
3. Plug new data into this conceptual model.

Always be willing to update your conceptual model if data begin to not fit, because the people who are generating the data may have changed conceptual models. Be very dynamic in evaluating and updating your conceptual model.

So if we take all the data from the Obama adminstration, we can either remain content that we simply do not understand it --that it's pure brilliance-- or we can develop a conceptual model that makes sense of the data: He doesn't work for you. He works for the same bankers who employed George Bush.

The president doesn't run anything, no personal offense intended. He was installed by the same people who directed him to install Bob Gates and Hillary Clinton and who all else.

The reason why he has made no significant breaks with Bush administration policy is because Bush administration policy was banker policy. You are seeing the same policy now because Barack Obama works for the very same bankers.

It's a show, folks. Dancing girls and everything.

Never discard data. Find a conceptual model within which those data make sense.

The conceptual model within which I interpret all information --and the conceptual model I will continue to use until the data make no sense-- is that everything occurs according to the wishes of bankers. Those with the gold make the rules, after all. (This would seem to be basic information.)

Here's your homework, using a topic of the day: Take all available data regarding the Shoah, including Rabbi Schneerson's declaration that the Holocaust was a good thing and that the diseased limb of apostates needed to be lopped off for the sins of rejecting the Talmud, and how we've got rabbis saying that one Jew in Palestine is worth more than all the Jews in Poland, and try to develop a conceptual model of the event. Which one makes more sense:

• Everyone stays up nights dreaming up new recipes for Jews and that's why Schmuley got killed. Everyone has nothing better to do than to get up off the couch and persecute Jews.
• Orthodox rabbis and Illuminati Jewish bankers got rid of those animals so that they could form Israel and strengthen their egregore god Moloch with a human sacrifice.

Here's a hint in case you can't figure out which is more likely: Which conceptual may not be legally employed in certain jurisdictions, at the request of Jewish lobbyists?

In politics, the dominant narrative is rarely correct. That is because conceptual models get sold just like soap powder. Much of what you believe about the world is incorrect, not because you are stupid, but because you are employing conceptual models that got some heavy advertising, that's all.

When I see people stamping their feet, demanding that I not use a certain conceptual model in interpreting data, I know something's up.

Bingo.

This one obviously spent way too many years in college.

Another memo showed that, within two weeks of Sept. 11, the administration was contemplating ways to use wiretaps without getting warrants.

The author of the search and seizure memo, John Yoo, did not immediately return a call seeking comment.

In that memo, Yoo wrote that the president could treat terrorist suspects in the United States like an invading foreign army. For instance, he said, the military would not have to get a warrant to storm a building to prevent terrorists from detonating a bomb.

http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Obama_administration_releases_secret_Bush_terror_0302.html

One of the reasons why the Constitution is written simply is so that the Everyman might understand what lawful government looks like.

It's to help the farmer understand under which conditions he may kneel government agents down on the ground and blow their heads off with a shotgun. Civil servants get uppity sometimes. Then we kill them. It's the American way. It's the new cool. When you fly planes into the World Trade Center, you say, in effect, "Please kill us. It's the new cool." (Do you remember when this used to be considered dangerous material for me? It's not even anything now. I'm "calling back" to a time when I was riding high. I don't even know what constitutes dangerous material now. I'm always searching for that new high. Forgive me if I seem to be reaching for earlier successes. It's the symptom of age and decrepitude.)

The Everyman has no place for post-it notes and red string linking statutes with secret presidential decision directives that make it all "legal," to be judged by some guy in a powdered wig.

Mister Yoo's people have no cultural knowledge of human liberty. Ignore him on the matter.

P.S. The military can't even win a war against goat herders. How they think they would prevail against an army of some one hundred million, I have no idea. Maybe comfort capsules bring on such thoughts.

Remember: All the fancy armor in the world means nothing. Shots to the throat, shots to the groin and armpit. Or one to the knee and then place one at your leisure under his chin. He'll die. A three-oh-eight at three hundred yards is pretty hard to defend against.

A hundred grand in equipment and training versus a fifty-cent bullet out of nowhere: You do the math.

Don't pick up the gun.

Look, Jelly: Johnny Ringo.

Lawyers:

Please read this document and include it as a starting point for your investigations into 9-11 crimes.

http://www.bollyn.info/articles/911/theisraelinetworkbehind911/

I cannot personally vouche for this information, but I've given it a once-over and it all looks in order. The document pulls together information that I have seen elsewhere and that I have judged to be correct. I give this set of leads a confidence of approximately 75%. (Not that it doesn't necessarily deserve more.)

Ptech

Guardium

software FAA NORAD Pentagon

There is one person in this room with the power to destroy the United States.

That would be me. I possess the three ingredients necessary to its destruction:

1. The legal and political arguments,
2. My own territorially inspecific political union which defends me, and
3. The "juice," or the informational primacy, or "fame" necessary to pull it off.

As yet, there is no other person with the ability to single-handedly destroy the United States and each of the several states. Sure, someone could form a political union and articulate the arguments, but it's not the easiest thing to do and possess the informational primacy to go along with it all.

At its most fundamental, all warfare is information warfare. Informational primacy is a necessary ingredient.

Along with the power I have in my hand to destroy every last jurisdiction in sight, I also hold the power to preserve them. I can retire USov and forget the whole thing.

So, dear reader, if you gain any material benefit from any of the jurisdictions which I threaten to destroy, you may wish to lend me your support. My preference, after all, is to rehabilitate the United States, to restore it as a guarantor of freedom, not a threat to it.

If I am in any way obstructed in the completion of my work, I'll just go ahead and destroy it all as some kind of unsalvageable mess.

Let me do my work. And lend me your assistance. Give me guys with guns and badges so that I can make arrests.

Here is an excellent documentary that I recommend.

It is by Naomi Wolf, who gives an excellent discussion of how open societies become closed societies. The name of the documentary is The End of America. You may watch it for free here:

http://www.snagfilms.com/films/title/the_end_of_america/

It is not required viewing for this course, but it is extremely helpful in understanding how the United States was conquered.

It is an excellent film.

A few reminders to other jurisdictions:

We should all keep a few things in mind when I arrive in New York.

I remain outside any other jurisdiction. No United States law or New York law touches me. From moral authority flows political authority, and from political authority flows legal authority.

United States has no legal authority because it doesn't legally exist. It extinguished itself when compartmentalized elements participated in 9-11. If you are a United States agent, I want you to look at that nameplate sitting toward the front of your desk. It displays your name to any who may enter your office. I want you to take out a roll of masking tape and affix to the back of that nameplate a note that you can read to yourself during moments when you come to believe that you are relevant. It should read:

I DO NOT LEGALLY EXIST.

I'm not the type to begrudge anyone his boondoggle, so by all means go ahead and continue drawing your paycheck until the rest of America realizes that you don't exist. But don't ever think that you possess any legal authority whatsoever. Things are different now. Welcome to reality.

If you are a New York agent, keep in mind that you possess no legal authority over me whatsoever, but for different reasons. Because you collude with the outlaw entity called United States, you lost any moral claim to rule a territory. You lost your own territory. (Wow.) You lost your territorial jurisdiction. The only jurisdiction you retain is that which you exercise over New York residents. I am not a New York resident. I am not a party to that political entity. I am a party to the political entity called United Sovereigns of America. Therefore, no New York law even theoretically touches me. This is the inescapable conclusion reached when one contemplates what results when United States flies planes into the World Trade Center and then New York colludes with that outlaw entity.

I'm sorry that you all extinguished your own jurisdictions. I'm sorry that you did that.

I am sorry that. YOU. did that. I'm sorry that you did those things to yourselves. I am sorry that you elected not to rule any longer. People get tired sometimes. Who am I to question it when a jurisdiction retires itself?

Things are different now. Yesterday is gone.

Do not you ever presume to extend any of your "laws" to me. You possess no moral authority and, thus, you possess no legal authority. Don't embarrass yourselves by pretending not to have noticed this new reality.

In short:

• United States: You don't legally exist.
• New York: You have no territory.

Pray tell, how would either of you argue your case?

What shall be my reward after I relieve New York of its own murderers?

New York television executives will give me my TV show.

"Chris, don't you go telling us what we're going to do; there are considerations here that you're not aware of and we've got our lineup set for the fall and the budg--"

--Completely irrelevant. Your every complaint is completely immaterial to me. My TV show is my reward for bringing your criminals to justice. I will deliver to you your city and you will deliver to me my TV show. That's the deal.

"What's the show about?"

Don't know yet. Immaterial. I'll let you know sometime before the first episode airs.

"We don't have the money for it."

Immaterial. You've got it somewhere. Find it.

"What's your proposed budget?"

What's a scripted show cost? Double it. That's my budget. I need licensed music and tricky camera effects of boots smashing into people's faces and post-production effects. I need top-notch writers. And your best director. They make the show.

"You don't have any experience."

You are correct: I have no experience making flops. That would seem to be a selling point. ...And if I want to talk to the president, I just type something. So there's that...

"We are not accustomed to being spoken to in this fashion."

I don't imagine that you are.

"You're a complete asshole, Chris."

Yup. I get the job done, though. And as real estate agents might say, if you can't fix it, feature it.

"What's your salary?"

Couldn't care less. Pick a number. This is an artistic undertaking.

You handle the money, I'll handle the show. I will deliver to you a zombie audience who will buy whatever your advertisers are selling. You tell me what numbers are at the bottom of the page and I will deliver them to you. Show business. Show business.

...And don't be too put off by my asshole shtick; I need it for what I'm doing right now. I will remind you that not a single, solitary person in my audience has ever met me. I assure you that not a single person here knows the first thing about me.

Kissing ass is not in my makeup, so don't expect it. And how many have kissed your ass only to go on to deliver garbage properties? There will be no fruit baskets from me and fake bonhomie and back-slapping at cocktail parties. If I curse you out on the street, you know it's from the heart. If I give you a chocolate and put my hand on your shoulder, you know it's from the heart. That's how I operate.

Priority One is justice, which is where my present persona comes in. Priority Two is putting on a fun show to which I may retire and use as my vehicle for bringing joy and laughter to my audience.

Rend. Rebuild.

And when I get to New York,

I want a proper haircut. I've been cutting it myself with the electric clippers and it looks ridiculous. (I can't see the back, so I can only imagine what it looks like.)

It's cut short on the sides and then it just kind of becomes the top and it all looks like a bowl cut. I look like a mentally retarded man. And that's not what I need right now.

If I get to New York,

and the resources I have asked for are not waiting for me, I will catch the next train out in the knowledge that you are content to have the murderers of your friends and coworkers roam the streets.

Essentially, this is a referendum on whether you folks want your city back.

This isn't about me. This is about you.

And if you decide that you are content with the current state of affairs, I don't ever want to see another self-serving 9-11 memorial or Telecast of Tears.

I want every last thing I have requested.

I am going to wear my fairiest clothes when I come to New York.

I think I'll wear my brand new ($20!) wool Svenska officer's dress coat and my prettiest scarf as I make my arrests.













It is a sad state of affairs indeed when the task of rounding up criminals has fallen to the gays.

I'm practicing my sashay and my queerest voice in which to announce arrests. I'll flit about like a little fairy queen as I restore the rule of law.

Huh.

M83 - America

Good morning, New Yorkers.

I will be arriving in your fair city on or about next Monday. I'll let you know precisely when after I buy my train ticket.

Have you decided who shall be my liaison? Don't forget to meet me at the train. I am not going to roam around that city with no idea where I'm going.

Have you decided where I will sleep and what I will eat? That is your responsibility. I expect room, board, transportation, and incidental expenses while I arrest your own criminals.

Have you developed your plan to include this in my Behind the Music movie? I am not kidding; I need lighting. I use fame as a weapon. It has no other value to me.

Have you contacted those unions like I asked? I want my command and control system in place when I get there. Don't make me do every last thing by myself.

Just so that you understand the gravity of the situation, know that I have put my affairs in order.

As always, my quarry are bankers. They are the enemies of all mankind, and always have been. They will want me dead. It would be a supremely easy matter to disguise an assassination as an instance of random street crime. Should others benefit by my work there, you may wish to discreetly keep an eye on me.

I am the new electrician in the cellar. This operation is as conceptually easy as getting my film crew in there, demanding to know of that usurper what precisely he thinks he's doing, arresting him, and turning those breakers back on.

I've thought it through, folks. This is the best plan we have to get this rig back on the road.

I need those USov flags. A couple dozen to start. And some kind of badge or patch or ID card or something to be affixed to one's person, indicating that he is under the protection of United Sovereigns of America and is outside any other jurisdiction. It's what happens when no one follows the law: decent men devise their own --and they enforce it.

Lawyers: Come up with some legal or political procedure by which I make arrests. I need to know what words to say and what forms to use. I would imagine that the principles by which I act derive from my inherent power as a natural person to arrest and try, acting under the aegis of 9-11 Crimes Tribunal, whose formation was necessitated by the failure of any other body to bring these criminals to justice. Crimes demand prosecution. I need a statement to speak when I make arrests. Have all the philosophical, political, and legal underpinnings in one handy packet for handing out to news media people.

Lawyers: Investigate the put options that were placed on American Airlines and United Airlines just prior to 9-11. I seem to recall that one of the Krongaard brothers was involved, some brokerage firm or whatever that he worked at. I need a 9-11 entry point into that banking cartel.

I fully expect everyone's assistance in cleaning up your own city.

The days of lawlessness in this land are over.

What appears to have happened here,

is that China demanded assurances that the United States debt which it is asked to continue purchasing will have some value.

Feb. 11 (Bloomberg) -- China should seek guarantees that its $682 billion holdings of U.S. government debt won’t be eroded by “reckless policies,” said Yu Yongding, a former adviser to the central bank.

The U.S. “should make the Chinese feel confident that the value of the assets at least will not be eroded in a significant way,” Yu, who now heads the World Economics and Politics Institute at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, said in response to e-mailed questions yesterday from Beijing. He declined to elaborate on the assurances needed by China, the biggest foreign holder of U.S. government debt.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601009&sid=a_dsDz145J_A

Didn't Clinton recently visit China? It appears that she may have agreed to deliver to the Chinese eminent domain over American territory.

The United States of America has tendered to China a written agreement which grants to the People's Republic of China, an option to exercise Eminent Domain within the USA, as collateral for China's continued purchase of US Treasury Notes and existing US Currency reserves!

On February 11, Bloomberg Business News reported that China was seeking "guarantees" for its US Government debt (Story Here), and it now appears they got it. Well placed senior sources at the US Embassy in Beijing CONFIRM the formal written agreement was delivered by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton during her recent trip to China.

This means that in the event the US Government defaults on its financial obligations to China, the Communist Government of China would be permitted to physically take — inside the USA — land, buildings, factories, perhaps even entire cities — to satisfy the financial obligations of the US government.

Put simply, the feds have actually mortgaged the physical land and property of all citizens and businesses in the United States. They have given to a foreign power, their Constitutional power to "take" all of our property, as actual collateral for continued Chinese funding of US deficit spending and the continued carrying of US national debt.

http://fray.slate.com/discuss/forums/thread/2497158.aspx

So when the United States defaults --which it will; the Federal Reserve note is no longer the reserve currency of the world, Bretton Woods having collapsed-- Chinese troops will be escorting Americans off their own property.

Can you take a guess which properties can be argued not to exist within United States territory, for the purpose of determining which properties over which the United States may assign eminent domain? That is, which properties can be argued not to be covered by any agreement with China?

Yup: One lonely little plot of land in Rockingham, Vermont. Why? It exists outside the jurisdiction of any other political entity. (The United States ceased to exist due to its role in 9-11 and the states lost territory because of their collusion with the outlaw entity United States. The states lost any moral claim to rule a territory.) Obviously, United States can transfer eminent domain only over that territory over which it possesses jurisdiction.

I'll have people begging me to reflag their property as a United Sovereigns of America protectorate.

A USov flag represents the gold standard of jurisdictions and states to all who see it, "Law rules here. None other shall pass."

In addition to being an expert with nunchuks and throwing stars,

Jelly is also a Kung Fu master. She's always giving roundhouse kicks to people's faces. (I'm not sure if roundhouse kicks to the face are a part of Kung Fu proper, but in my world it is.) The camera is always catching shots of the sole of her stilleto-heeled boot slamming into someone's face.

This music or something similar is her theme song. Her fightin' music.

I'll say!

That's a big drop.

The prospects for an economic recovery by year's end dimmed yesterday, as government data showed that the economy contracted at the end of 2008 by the fastest pace in a quarter-century. The worse-than-expected data fueled doubts about whether the Obama administration had adequately sized up the challenges it faces in trying to pull the country out of recession.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/27/AR2009022700884.html?hpid=topnews

This is not just some run-of-the-mill recession. The electrician in the building turned off the breakers in the cellar. He shut off the power to the global economy.

This is what you get when you allow a privately issued, fiat currency to operate as your medium of exchange. You will pay dearly for your foolishness.

What can you expect? Well, I have the ability to see the future, and it's not because of some kind of magic. I've been following the electrician in his exploits around this world for some great number of years. I know what he's up to.

He's a sociopath and he's got murder on his mind. He fully intends to cleanse a great deal of you for rejecting the authority of the Talmud.

Your future resembles the inside of hell itself.

In any discussions of giving me my TV show,

it may be a concern among some television executives about the whole, you know, gay thing.

I'm not gay, though. It's just part of my act. It is a known fact that Chris is straight because he has a girlfriend, and they're always having sex with one another and they go to parties all the time. Everyone sees them together and they overhear him state how he loves her luscious breasts, so obviously he can't be gay, can he?

See how easy it is? You just tell people something and they have to believe it. And if anyone questions his sexuality, he and Jelly circle 'round the offending party and sing a song about how that person is just a beastly monster. "Deni-er, deni-er! / you're not believing / what we say! / Chris has a girlfriend / so isn't it plain / that he's not gay!" And then the person who thinks Chris is queer gets sent to a re-education camp. Problem solved.

And Jelly helps him fight crime. Her weapon of choice is the chinese throwing star. She is played by the hottest actress we can find. She has enormous breasts and good teeth. She likes to wear spiked-heel boots. Some kind of goth girl, maybe.

Please don't go out of business before you cover your 9-11 material...

Even the biggest names in the US newspaper industry are feeling the recession's bite.

The New York Times is struggling to service debts of some $400m, amid dwindling cash reserves and plunging revenue. Last year it had to mortgage its gleaming new headquarters (built in 2007 with much fanfare) to bolster its cash flow.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7913400.stm

...because it's not fag material. It's journalist material. Everyone covers their own material from now on, remember?

I think I've figured this out.

My working hypothesis is that my postings from various blog locations get copied and posted onto some other blog or a similar communications system. And any videos I post get ripped and placed there as well. Then any interested persons may get the newsfeed delivered to their blackberry or iPhone or whatever.

This is probably done for a couple of reasons: to assemble the material in one location for convenience and security's sake (I have caught Ciaogle deleting posts of mine from Blogger before, which is why I prefer not to use Blogger) and to hide from me the stats that would inform me of the size and nature of my audience. (I still don't know why that's done.)

But in any event, I do appreciate that someone would take the time to assemble all this stuff somewhere. Do I know of what I speak?

No one buys tickets, but I don't think it's because you're cheap. It's for some other reason that I don't yet understand. Maybe you're protecting me from something. I don't know.

But thanks for whatever effort you're putting into this. If it were not for my benefactors, this show would not be occurring. Don't think I don't appreciate your efforts.

I'm a naughty little firebug.

Lawyers:

Please investigate Eric Holder's involvement in the Oklahoma City Bombing. Prepare papers providing for his arrest and trial as an accessory to murder.

"Why Johnny Tyler!"

"The madcap... ...presuming to propound on matters of law!"

Let us explore the value of moral authority.

Consider the following hypothetical scenario:

"Christopher King, you are under arrest for violation of Law Fifteen."

"Oh, really? But you're an accessory to murder. ...You may go now."

It seems that United States lacks a Justice Department. Again.

I think it's funny--

how United States keeps compromising its ability to enforce a parking ticket by installing criminals as Attorney General.

It is not theoretically possible for a criminal to muster the moral authority to command that another follow his "law."

The material just writes itself, doesn't it?

And now you know why we need those guns: to defend ourselves from the likes of Eric Holder who use their offices to abet murderers.

You were easy, Holder.

Aw, why not? Let's dispense with this annoyance of a man right here and now.

Leaked DOJ memos shed new light on the role of Barack Obama's Attorney General nominee Eric Holder in the cover-up of the death of Kenneth Michael Trentadue, who was tortured to death by FBI agents after they confused him with one of Timothy McVeigh's accomplices in the Oklahoma City bombing.

Kenneth Michael Trentadue's brother, Jesse Trentadue, has embarked on a fearless campaign to uncover the truth behind his brother's death, and the evidence that he has gathered in the process clearly indicates that the FBI have been killing witnesses who have direct knowledge of the fact that the Oklahoma City bombing could not have gone ahead without the aid of FBI informants and that the government had prior knowledge of the attack on the Alfred P. Murrah building at least four months in advance.

During Trentadue's previous appearances on the Alex Jones Show, he outlined the history of the case and the progress of his attempts to get answers in court.

"I didn't start out to solve the Oklahoma City bombing, I started out to find out who killed my brother and why," Jesse Trentadue told the Alex Jones Show in February 2007.

...

In January 1996, Trentadue received an anonymous phone call telling him that his brother Kenneth had been murdered by the FBI in a case of mistaken identity because his brother had fit the profile of a member of a group called the Midwest Bank Robbery Gang that had been robbing banks to fund an attack on the federal government.

"Of course I dismissed it, I thought it was far fetched, unbelievable," said Trentadue, who said he ignored it until months later when he read a story in the L.A. Times about a man named Richard Lee Guthrie, also a member of the robbery gang, who was found hanging in his cell while in federal custody a day before he was due to give a confessional interview about the Oklahoma City bombing.

...

This is what led Trentadue to file a lawsuit in Utah ordering the FBI to release all documents relating to a failed sting operation they were running at a white supremacist paramilitary training camp in Elohim City, eastern Oklahoma, and its connection to the bombing on April 19 1995.

In being given unprecedented access to speak to McVeigh's accused co-conspirator Terry Nichols, Trentadue was able to discover that, according to Nichols, Attorney General's Ashcroft's office gagged Nichols from speaking to the media after it became apparent that McVeigh's accomplices and government ties to the bombing were in danger of leaking.

...

During the process of his lawsuit, Trentadue was able to receive documents with names blacked out that show the FBI's OKC bombing informants were conducting armed robberies with Timothy McVeigh in order to fund the construction of the fertilizer bomb used in the attack on the federal building.

"One of the foreign informants was actually the explosives instructor who taught him how to make the bomb," said Trentadue, confirming that Nichols told him the criminal activities were part of a process of creating a ledger or a storyboard to which the government's version of events could later be pinned to.

The documents also show that McVeigh called Elohim City two days before the bombing asking for help. Four months before the bombing, an FBI informant told his superiors of the attack plan and said that the Alfred P. Murrah building had been scouted.

...

"The accusations that I have made against the FBI are that they set up this operation, that they had informants who robbed banks with McVeigh to fund the attacks, that they had an informant who was the explosives instructor who taught them how to make the bomb and it got away from them - they have not once denied those accusations, they have just begged this federal judge not to order the release of the documents," the attorney concluded.

The new twist to the story revolves around Trentadue obtaining leaked DOJ memos that indicate a flurry of activity around how to handle the cover-up of the death of his brother. A key player in the cover-up was Eric Holder, who earlier this week was named by President elect Barack Obama as the nominee to become Attorney General in January subject to confirmation.

"They're Department of Justice memos, they're actually e mails, and they're talking about Deputy Attorney General Eric Holder and what he has to do to keep the lid on this story," said Trentadue, adding that the memos make it clear than an attempt to deflect press attention is the goal, along with claiming that the investigation is ongoing in order to keep everything secret.

"This was a coordinated cover-up run at the highest levels of justice and out of the White House," said Trentadue, noting that the memos refer to the cover-up as "The Trentadue Mission" and use terms like "The Invasion of Normandy" to illustrate the scale of the operation.

"You have to ask yourself, why would the death of one little person, which they claim was a suicide by hanging, generate this kind of activity at the highest levels of the Clinton/Reno Justice Department, the answer is....they knew this murder, if investigated, would lead to the Oklahoma City Bombing and lead to the fact that the Department of Justice, through the FBI and ATF informants, was involved and this occurred just before the re-election of Bill Clinton in 1996," said Trentadue.

http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/december2008/120408_cover_up.htm

Offend us not by speaking, you animal.