If you read the entire piece written by Mister Reich in today's Washington Post --and I highly suggest that you do-- he essentially accuses me of trickery. He never addresses my points. (Of course he would not because that piece was not directed at me or you, my audience. That piece was directed at his audience. He saw how effectively I demolished the Holocaust narrative, alarm bells went off in the scholars' headquarters, and he was tasked with accounting for that new approach in their latest version of propaganda. That was the purpose of his piece. Like the Borg Collective, they have adapted to the lethality of my weapon.)
But his response is instructive in considering the phenomenon of projection.
There are --as I can see so far-- three "operational licenses" that Orthodox Jews reserve to themselves: They allow themselves to lie to, steal from, and trick members of competing clans. You can read this right in their own texts. This is not a secret.
Orthodox Jews project hate onto others because they themselves hate.
Orthodox Jews project trickery onto others because they themselves trick.
Mister Reich is so full of trickery that he can't even see the merits of my argument. He assumes --completely ignoring the rational nature of my piece-- that I was just engaging in trickery.
He tricks, so he sees trickery everywhere.
I will concede to you that my attack upon the Holocaust narrative was deft, elegant, and sublimely balletic. Come on, admit it: You haven't seen such a skilled takedown like that in some time, have you? I'm rather pleased with myself. I disemboweled that bag of filth and got away with none on me.
My attack was a thing of beauty.
...but it wasn't trickery, because its delivery was fortified by substance.
Incidentally, the scholars refer to their nemesis Jesus as a "sorcerer," beguiling the people with his tricks.
The scholar does not speak truth; he speaks lies. He tricks.
...and that is why he sees them everywhere.
Saturday, January 31, 2009
Truly from a clinical standpoint, there is intelligence to be found in the most casual of statements.
http://walt.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2009/01/29/is_iran_a_bigger_challenge_than_the_global_economic_crisis_bibi_thinks_soWhat's the biggest problem facing the world today? Most people would probably say the downward spiral of the global economy. Over at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Steve Schwartzman, chairman of the Blackstone private equity group, said "Forty percent of the world's wealth was destroyed in last five quarters. It is an almost incomprehensible number." NewsCorp chief Rupert Murdoch warned "the crisis is getting worse” and said that fixing it "will take a long time."
Former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu -- whose Likud Party is leading the current polls in Israel -- begs to differ. According to the Associated Press, Netanyahu told the Davos crowd that Iran's nuclear program "ranks far above the global economy as a challenge facing world leaders."
Why? According to Netanyahu, it's because the financial meltdown is reversible if governments and business make the right decisions. But "what is not reversible is the acquisition of nuclear weapons by a fanatical radical regime," he said, adding that "we have never had, since the dawn of the nuclear age, nuclear weapons in hands of such a fanatical regime."
Once you come to understand Talmudic Judaism, and once you dispassionately view it as essentially a gaming strategy that, in part, creates an enslaved people to be used as an army, you can apply a psychotherapist's observational skills to its practitioners. I do believe that Talmudic teachings are so contrary to innate human moral codes that the inculcating of it in a child causes mental problems. These children grow up to be very damaged people.
The most prevalent of the clues that I routinely see is one called projection. From About.com we find a definition of it:
Projection is a defense mechanism that involves taking our own unacceptable qualities or feelings and ascribing them to other people. For example, if you have a strong dislike for someone, you might instead believe that he or she does not like you. Projection functions to allow the expression of the desire or impulse, but in a way that the ego cannot recognize, therefore reducing anxiety.The description above is perfectly appropriate because it contemplates hate, which Mister Reich envisions as the motivator behind anyone who points out that no one hates Jews like the scholars do. The projection above may be rephrased like this: "I hate you so much, and since undying hatred is contrary to my innate human code, I will unconsciously accuse you of hating me. This allows my hatred to be expressed in a manner that reduces anxiety, since anxiety is a response to an uncomfortable situation, a situation that goes against my natural, innate programming."
http://psychology.about.com/od/theoriesofpersonality/ss/defensemech_5.htm
Humans have a natural programming, a natural moral code. According to this above-stated psychological theory --which, in my experience, seems quite valid-- projection occurs when a sentiment conflicts with this natural programming. Of course it does; people --in a quiescent, neutral state-- do not hate. Outside Talmudic Judaism, quiescent hatred does not exist as a concept.
No one hates naturally. By nature, people love. People prefer to be loved. No one prefers to be hated. When you watch a young child, you see him filled with nothing but a desire to be affectionate and to give love to get love. People hate only after they have been taught to hate.
When a Jew accuses another of hating him, he is unconsciously engaging in projection. He is engaging in projection because his own undying hatred of everything and everyone runs counter to his innate human programming to love. The Talmudic programming to hate everything and everyone is quite unnaturally bolted on top of his basic human programming to love. This conflict produces the pressure-release-valve projection that everyone hates him. The word "anti-semite" exists as a manifestation of this projection. The word has no meaning except to the person who needs the services of this pressure-release valve.
(You will not fully see the truth in this diagnosis until you read that book, Judaism Discovered. I lost count of the number of times hate is mentioned. I am two hundred pages into that book and I have not yet once seen the word "love." The Talmud is a death-based philosophy that employs hate as an energy source. Of the various religions I have made a cursory study of, it is the only one whose programming runs counter to innate human programming.)
When I see Mister Netanyahu decry Iran as a "fanatical regime," I can see right through that and into his subconscious mind. I know that when he says such a thing --because he knows as well as I do that no Iranian participated in 9-11; plenty of Jews did-- I can tell that he is accusing Iran of being a fanatical regime because he knows --at least on some subconscious level-- that his own regime is fanatical. (They believe non-Jews to be subhuman, after all. You don't get more fanatical than that.) And he cautions against permitting Iran to have nuclear weapons because --again, at least on some subconscious level-- he knows that it is inadvisable that Israel possess nuclear weapons --because his most basic human mind understands that his nation is very ill and should not possess them. He knows that his nation is very ill because of the Jews that were sacrificed in order to found it. He knows --in his most basic mind-- that allowing Israel to have nuclear weapons is like giving a mental patient a gun. His mind knows full well that Israel will destroy this world if given the chance.
It is possible to see directly into a person's most basic mind once you learn to read their projections.
And, again, if you care to study the Talmud, you will see that there is no one in this world as hateful as an Orthodox Jew. The Orthodox sect --to my still-learning eye-- appears to be the one most fully influenced by the Talmud. The Talmud influence trickles down and becomes more diluted as it enters the "cultural Jew" range, and then becomes unknown in the Abrahamic "old-school Jew" range. (Incidentally, I am coming to suspect that the "two brothers" who are battling for Jerusalem represent Abrahamists and Talmudists. Can you guess who wins? Who is the Christian nearly identical to?)
Orthodox Jews believe non-Jews to be subhuman. That is something that you need to understand. And they employ trickery as part of their gaming strategy. You need to understand that too. No word out of an Orthodox Jew's mouth can be believed because we can see in their own religious prescriptions that a non-Jew may be lied to in order to achieve clan objectives.
Dealing with Jews can be a very confusing experience because you can't know to what degree they were inculcated with Talmudic teachings. You can't know which moral code prevails in their mind --the innate human moral code energized by love or the bolted-on code energized by hate.
When you see a Jew on the street, know that he is likely extremely disturbed. Depending of course on the intensity of his religious indoctrination as a child, he may have death-based programming bolted on top of his innate human programming. He very well may be a mess of successive layers of traumatizing brain washing. He has likely been emotionally abused ever since he was a child. The Talmud appears to be a "satanically"-inspired document that is employed to enslave a human population. It creates generation after generation of slaves by traumatizing the children. The Talmud is the worst thing that ever happened to Jews.
That programming has to be "punched through." The only way to penetrate his programming --that hatred is the one and only energy source-- is to love him ...because this exposes to his mind that not everyone hates. If not everyone hates, then it is a lie that everyone hates. If his bolted-on programming is shown to him to be a lie, it evaporates.
And he instantly becomes well.
Fine. I'll take the bait.
Dozens of cities held ceremonies last week to mark International Holocaust Remembrance Day. The good news is that the dead were remembered. The bad news is that even as the Holocaust is becoming a fixture in the world's memory, it is also being increasingly used as a weapon against the Jews and the Jewish state.
For some, ironically, the acknowledgment of the Holocaust's reality has become a screen behind which anti-Semitism has gathered new force. The hard-core Jew-haters spent decades denying that the best-documented genocide in world history ever took place. That won them such derision that even many anti-Semites have begun to admit the reality of the Holocaust -- and now are hoping that simply by doing so, they can immunize themselves from the charge that they're anti-Semites in the first place. How can you be an anti-Semite, they figure, if you recognize the Holocaust?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/30/AR2009013002770.html
Nut job alert.
Let me tell you how I operate. People think that I do material for gratuitous purposes. I don't. I have better things to do than to cover old ground again and again.
Sometime in 2005 I noticed that somehow people in the news media were getting my material. (I still don't understand how they started or how they get it today. It's one of the imponderables in my world.) I would attack a meme that I saw expressed in the news and I would notice a lessening of that meme. So in this infosphere that is comprised of bloggers, newspaper people, TV people, and government and NGO types, I was driving my USS Armageddon around and unleashing full broadsides on virulent memes --and I was sinking them.
I engage in meme warfare. There is a logic to what I do. You will not understand a single word I ever uttered outside the context of a military campaign.
Back in 2005, back when I started pointing out New World Order --and, hence, Jewish-- complicity in 9-11, I saw a very predictable trotting-out of that tired old saw that everyone just hates Jews. It was called "the new anti-semitism." This, presumably, is a name for how people with no axe to grind whatsoever just magically decide to get up from their X-boxes and resolve that their new calling in life is to hate Jews.
So I replied to the meme with this: "The 'new anti-semitism?' Is this where we get to exterminate the Jews at long last? Where do I sign?" (I rarely shine up an old joke for re-telling --I'm positively full of them, so why use old material?-- but this is one of my favorites.)
And I never saw that meme again. That was easy. Bloomp! That one went under the sea, never to show itself again until today. (The title of this article in the Post is The New Anti-Semitism.)
Like a bad movie remake, it's back.
Just stay down. I hate covering old ground. Just stay. down.
Now I have to say a few more things:
Mister Reich, look: I'm sorry that you fried yourselves. I'm sorry that the urn that holds Granma's ashes has a cheap label on the bottom that says "Made in Israel." I'm sorry that your country is a satanic abomination. I'm sorry that you're a member of the Jewish Drone Army who doesn't even know that the rabbis found it useful that great, billowing clouds of Jew smoke smudge the sky. I'm sorry that the scholars regard the masses as pigs and stuff them right into the oven.
How is this my fault? How do I figure into this?
I never fried Shmuley, I never made a lampshade out of Hymie.
I'm not the one who claims that all the Jews in Poland are worth less than one cow in Palestine.
The only relevant question, really, that one may apply to my claims of Jewish complicity in the Holocaust is this: "Is it true?"
Aside from the veracity of the claim, I don't actually care. I have way, way better things to do with my time than to do Jew material that serves only to delay my entry into television.
Silly me, there I was thinking that Jews were just, like, regular people. But to hear the scholars tell it, they're disgusting pig animals who are worth less than nothing.
Nut. job. alert. Why are you running interference for Granma's murderers? Why do you hate Jews so much? Sheesh, it must be the new anti-semitism; everyone's coming down with it.
Someday, Mister Reich, in a galaxy far, far away, long after you have left this physical realm, you will come to know just how much I love you.
Can you even possibly conceive of the depth of my love for you? You are the love of my life, Mister Reich. You are my first thought in the morning and my last thought at night.
I won, Mister Reich, fair and square. You fried yourselves. Any inquiry will prove this.
It's over.
Now kneel before your King.
I bet you a day's pay,
such as it is, that this man is a tax cheat too.
How many of you criminals over at United States have fudged your taxes?
That means that you are tax cheats. That is a crime. It's no wonder that United States can't bring itself to prosecute torturers, eavesdroppers, and other criminals, because you're all criminals. Everyone's got something on everyone else, don't they? So you all make a good show of it by prosecuting those who lack the ability to defend themselves. The little people, the ones with nothing on you.
...Well I got somethin' on ya. And I am going to clean your clocks once and for all.
The IRS has known about me for fifteen years because I sent letters to them by certified mail detailing my good faith belief that the income tax was being misapplied to me. I informed them that if they could not correct my understanding of the statutes, that I would not be filing ever again.
And I have not. And I have no intention of ever doing so. ...because I never heard back from them.
This country is a fraud from A to Z, isn't it?
P.S. Back when Alberto Gonzales was Attorney General, back when all the stops were being pulled out to get the goods on me, they must have come across my name on some "tax protester" list and figured that they had hit pay dirt. So a couple years ago some IRS guys come by the gas station looking for me. They never found me, so they settled for speaking with my boss. Nothing came of it because I never heard from them again.
So over here we've got a ten-dollar-an-hour gas station attendant who had PLAINLY INFORMED THE IRS MORE THAN A DECADE EARLIER that he had a good-faith intention never to pay another nickel in income tax, and over here we've got MILLIONAIRES who are cheating on their taxes, hoping that no one ever finds out.
See that you never, ever look me in the eye again, much less embarrass me by sending your substance-eater agents around to my place of work. It gives my business associates the impression that I am in trouble with the law.
You don't get it yet, do you? Every last thing I have ever done in my life has been in accordance with some good-faith effort to follow the law. I do not cheat. I never cheated on my taxes and I never, ever cheated on a test in school.
When that Massachusetts state trooper stopped me, one of the things he asked me was if I had any outstanding warrants or if I had ever been in trouble with the law. I replied, "Nope. I am the most law-abiding person you will ever meet."
And I am, aren't I?
I have been investigated up one side and down the next. I am the most highly vetted person in this room.
You will never, ever get me. ...because there is nothing on me.
Republican Sen. Judd Gregg (N.H.) emerged yesterday as a serious contender to fill the remaining post in President Obama's Cabinet, saying he is under consideration by the White House to become commerce secretary, which opens the possibility of a filibuster-proof Democratic majority in the Senate.http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/30/AR2009013003433.html?hpid=topnews
How many of you criminals over at United States have fudged your taxes?
That means that you are tax cheats. That is a crime. It's no wonder that United States can't bring itself to prosecute torturers, eavesdroppers, and other criminals, because you're all criminals. Everyone's got something on everyone else, don't they? So you all make a good show of it by prosecuting those who lack the ability to defend themselves. The little people, the ones with nothing on you.
...Well I got somethin' on ya. And I am going to clean your clocks once and for all.
The IRS has known about me for fifteen years because I sent letters to them by certified mail detailing my good faith belief that the income tax was being misapplied to me. I informed them that if they could not correct my understanding of the statutes, that I would not be filing ever again.
And I have not. And I have no intention of ever doing so. ...because I never heard back from them.
This country is a fraud from A to Z, isn't it?
P.S. Back when Alberto Gonzales was Attorney General, back when all the stops were being pulled out to get the goods on me, they must have come across my name on some "tax protester" list and figured that they had hit pay dirt. So a couple years ago some IRS guys come by the gas station looking for me. They never found me, so they settled for speaking with my boss. Nothing came of it because I never heard from them again.
So over here we've got a ten-dollar-an-hour gas station attendant who had PLAINLY INFORMED THE IRS MORE THAN A DECADE EARLIER that he had a good-faith intention never to pay another nickel in income tax, and over here we've got MILLIONAIRES who are cheating on their taxes, hoping that no one ever finds out.
See that you never, ever look me in the eye again, much less embarrass me by sending your substance-eater agents around to my place of work. It gives my business associates the impression that I am in trouble with the law.
You don't get it yet, do you? Every last thing I have ever done in my life has been in accordance with some good-faith effort to follow the law. I do not cheat. I never cheated on my taxes and I never, ever cheated on a test in school.
When that Massachusetts state trooper stopped me, one of the things he asked me was if I had any outstanding warrants or if I had ever been in trouble with the law. I replied, "Nope. I am the most law-abiding person you will ever meet."
And I am, aren't I?
I have been investigated up one side and down the next. I am the most highly vetted person in this room.
You will never, ever get me. ...because there is nothing on me.
See? I'm a trendsetter.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090131/ap_on_go_pr_wh/daschle_taxesWASHINGTON – Former Sen. Tom Daschle, picked by President Barack Obama to lead his health reform efforts, recently filed amended tax returns to report $128,203 in back taxes and $11,964 in interest, according to a Senate document obtained by The Associated Press.
The White House acknowledged Friday that "some tax issues" had emerged in connection with the nomination, but a spokesman said the president is confident the former Senate Democratic leader will be confirmed as the new health secretary.
But if you're going to be a tax cheat, Mister Daschle, at least give the appearance of doing it out of principle.
It's like --and, gosh, it's been so long now since I've paid any income tax I can't even remember how it all started-- but it's an empowering feeling, really, just leaning over the edge of the stage here and taking my hand out of my pocket and aligning it like some lumbering crane right in front of your face, ratcheting up an enormous, spring-like potential energy in my middle finger, its destructive power only barely held back by my thumb and --boink!-- letting the bird fly right in your face.
Hi, thieves! Cheats!
Criminals one and all.
Friday, January 30, 2009
Netanyahu is laying plot points.
Benjamin Netanyahu, the favorite to win the upcoming Israeli election, says al Qaeda terrorists will destroy Jesus Christ's burial site.http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=83985§ionid=351020202
Netanyahu, who claims he had predicted an Islamic extremists attack on the World Trade Center six years before the actual attack, said terrorists will target Church of the Holy Sepulchre also known as the Church of the Resurrection - Christianity's holiest site.
The church located in Jerusalem (al-Quds) -- which Christians believe is the site of the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus -- attracts tens of thousands of pilgrims every year and is considered a spiritual focal point.
"Radical Islam is willing and will want to attack the symbolic heart of the Christian religion," said the former Israeli prime minister.
"This will incur a chain reaction we can't even envision. We will witness an escalation of religious conflict above and beyond the regional conflict we have now," Daily Telegraph quoted him as saying.
The Right-wing Likud leader said he had warned in a 1995 book -- six years before the September 11 attacks -- that "Islamist terrorists" would detonate a nuclear device in the World Trade Centre in New York.
OK. Where to start.
When I say someone is "laying plot points," what I mean is that the person is laying a backstory to "preemptively spin" a future event. "Oh my goodness! Did someone blow up the Church of the Holy Sepulchre? It must have been Al Qaeda like I said. See how much credibility I have? I predicted this very event."
Al Qaeda is a front operation for the Illuminati bankers who commissioned both 9-11 and the Shoah. Al Qaeda is essentially synonymous with Mossad, since Mossad populates fake Al Qaeda cells with brown people for trotting out in front of airport cameras. We know this now.
Netanyahu is laying plot points in order to project suspicion elsewhere when Israelis blow up the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, which I gather they intend to do. They will seek to gin up a conflict between Christians and Muslims. (Christ and Mohammed have no quarrel. There is only one bothersome little gnat among us, one that is going to get crushed very, very soon.)
And, further, that Netanyahu "predicted" an attack on the World Trade Center confers no credibility upon him whatsoever since an accurate "prediction" can also be had as the result of inside information. And we know now that the operation positively crawled with Jews; not a single Muslim was to be found --except the ones who got filmed by airport cameras, those photos breathlessly waved around by the Jewish Drone Army in the news media, the ones who are so stupid that they don't even know that they work in a system that found it useful that Uncle Shmuley get a set of ice tongs to the head. It's all for the Homeland, right?
There is a surfeit of stupidity in this weary world.
Step aside. We can see how well the stupid have done.
Let's examine this Bishop Williamson issue. He denies the Holocaust, the Pope reinstates him or whatever, and Jews stamp their feet. (What else is new.)
First off, which historians are you talking about? ...Because the Russians quote one number, the International Red Cross quotes another, and Jews quote yet another.
So which is it?
Forget for the moment that I'm smacking my lips at the prospect of eating Jew babies. Maybe I just want to know which number is correct. I don't actually care. (And I will point out that six million appears to have some kind of numerological significance. The Shoah was a human sacrifice to a thoughtform, an egregore, offered up by a satanic sect who appear to be Sabbateans. This egregore is to have his seat at Jerusalem. It appears that the six million number has some "strength" that lends a durability to that false Jewish homeland. Knowing the Zionist goal as I do, I am going to look askance at any Jewish claim of the extent of the deaths, because I know that there would be the incentive to inflate that number.)
And it makes no difference anyway since I have shown Jewish complicity in the Shoah.
Jews played an instrumental if not directorial role in the Shoah. Fact.
So it didn't go down quite as advertised, then, did it?
A narrative that is not true to its advertising is a fraudulent representation. Isn't it?
Therefore, the Holocaust narrative is a fraud. Whether it be a fraud in any overstatement of the numbers or whether it be a fraud in the identity of the actors behind it makes no difference. Either inconsistency is sufficient to qualify the narrative as a fraud. Cooking Jew babies up and eating them in no way figures into the debate.
And I'll tell you right now, it is VITALLY IMPORTANT to Zionist objectives that the Shoah not be widely known to be a fraud. ...Because then the egregore gets powered down. THE TRUTH KILLS THEIR GOD. You need to understand how these satanists think.
To catch a criminal, you must think like a criminal.
I will point out that the proper argumental approach is this one: You don't question the numbers, because then you run up against that definition of the linguistic warfare word called "Holocaust Denier." You are questioning --and, hence, presumably, diminishing-- the extent of the eternal suffering that is part of the narrative. You become a big meanie.
The proper rhetorical approach is not to question the magnitude of the event, but to helpfully offer to certify the guilt of the killers. Because who can take issue with that, right? Everyone wants to see the guity parties in jail, right? Granma deserves no less, right?
So I'll accept their six million number. As a matter of fact, because I'm such a nice guy, I'll go ahead and call it five quadrillion. I'm a swell guy. FIVE QUADRILLION JEWS DIED IN THE HOLOCAUST. SATISFIED?
Now because it's so, so extra special tear-jerking and since no one could possibly complain with tracking down the murderers behind FIVE QUADRILLION DEATHS OF THE BEAUTIFUL PEOPLE, rhetorically no one can possibly complain about my helpfully pointing out that the real culprits were Jews themselves. They fried Granma so they could found that abortion called Israel.
Me smart. You dumb. Mommy win. You lose.
SEE HOW SMART ME AM? ME TALK RINGS AROUND YOU. SEE WHO REALLY RUN THIS HOUSEHOLD?
And further, when a thing is constructed pursuant to a narrative that turns out to be fraudulent, that thing disappears. It's a fraud. It doesn't exist as advertised.
Ergo, Israel is dead.
Please accomodate yourselves to this reality.
Euthanizing that deformed monster baby was fun. I'm sorry that you fried yourselves. Enjoy the stink while you can.
But moaning and groaning about how much I hate you is a bit like Lynddie England blaming the news media for all the fuss about Abu Ghraib.
The material just writes itself, doesn't it?
"Why did Chris do so much Jew material?"
"He was lazy."
I go where the jokes are, folks. Why put myself out to invent them?
Let's examine this Bishop Williamson issue. He denies the Holocaust, the Pope reinstates him or whatever, and Jews stamp their feet. (What else is new.)
The Chief Rabbinate of Israel has cut ties with the Vatican over the Pope’s decision to lift the excommunication of an English bishop who denies the full extent of the Holocaust.
In a measure of Jewish anger around the world at the reinstating of the four bishops of the Society of St Pius X, the Chief Rabbinate has written to the office of Pope Benedict XVI condemning Bishop Richard Williamson’s comments as outrageous. The letter was leaked to The Jerusalem Post. Jewish leaders in the UK have also protested at the lifting of the excommunications but others criticised the Chief Rabbinate’s decision, saying it could harm interfaith dialogue.
Bishop Williamson, who was educated at Winchester and Cambridge and converted to Catholicism as a young man, told Swedish television that no Jews died in gas chambers, and that up to 300,000 died in the Holocaust. Historians generally accept that six million Jews died.
First off, which historians are you talking about? ...Because the Russians quote one number, the International Red Cross quotes another, and Jews quote yet another.
So which is it?
Forget for the moment that I'm smacking my lips at the prospect of eating Jew babies. Maybe I just want to know which number is correct. I don't actually care. (And I will point out that six million appears to have some kind of numerological significance. The Shoah was a human sacrifice to a thoughtform, an egregore, offered up by a satanic sect who appear to be Sabbateans. This egregore is to have his seat at Jerusalem. It appears that the six million number has some "strength" that lends a durability to that false Jewish homeland. Knowing the Zionist goal as I do, I am going to look askance at any Jewish claim of the extent of the deaths, because I know that there would be the incentive to inflate that number.)
And it makes no difference anyway since I have shown Jewish complicity in the Shoah.
Jews played an instrumental if not directorial role in the Shoah. Fact.
So it didn't go down quite as advertised, then, did it?
A narrative that is not true to its advertising is a fraudulent representation. Isn't it?
Therefore, the Holocaust narrative is a fraud. Whether it be a fraud in any overstatement of the numbers or whether it be a fraud in the identity of the actors behind it makes no difference. Either inconsistency is sufficient to qualify the narrative as a fraud. Cooking Jew babies up and eating them in no way figures into the debate.
And I'll tell you right now, it is VITALLY IMPORTANT to Zionist objectives that the Shoah not be widely known to be a fraud. ...Because then the egregore gets powered down. THE TRUTH KILLS THEIR GOD. You need to understand how these satanists think.
To catch a criminal, you must think like a criminal.
I will point out that the proper argumental approach is this one: You don't question the numbers, because then you run up against that definition of the linguistic warfare word called "Holocaust Denier." You are questioning --and, hence, presumably, diminishing-- the extent of the eternal suffering that is part of the narrative. You become a big meanie.
The proper rhetorical approach is not to question the magnitude of the event, but to helpfully offer to certify the guilt of the killers. Because who can take issue with that, right? Everyone wants to see the guity parties in jail, right? Granma deserves no less, right?
So I'll accept their six million number. As a matter of fact, because I'm such a nice guy, I'll go ahead and call it five quadrillion. I'm a swell guy. FIVE QUADRILLION JEWS DIED IN THE HOLOCAUST. SATISFIED?
Now because it's so, so extra special tear-jerking and since no one could possibly complain with tracking down the murderers behind FIVE QUADRILLION DEATHS OF THE BEAUTIFUL PEOPLE, rhetorically no one can possibly complain about my helpfully pointing out that the real culprits were Jews themselves. They fried Granma so they could found that abortion called Israel.
Me smart. You dumb. Mommy win. You lose.
SEE HOW SMART ME AM? ME TALK RINGS AROUND YOU. SEE WHO REALLY RUN THIS HOUSEHOLD?
And further, when a thing is constructed pursuant to a narrative that turns out to be fraudulent, that thing disappears. It's a fraud. It doesn't exist as advertised.
Ergo, Israel is dead.
Please accomodate yourselves to this reality.
Euthanizing that deformed monster baby was fun. I'm sorry that you fried yourselves. Enjoy the stink while you can.
But moaning and groaning about how much I hate you is a bit like Lynddie England blaming the news media for all the fuss about Abu Ghraib.
The material just writes itself, doesn't it?
"Why did Chris do so much Jew material?"
"He was lazy."
I go where the jokes are, folks. Why put myself out to invent them?
"But, Chris, what do we do?"
- There is only one man in Washington who knows what he's talking about: Ron Paul. Do what he recommends.
- If an economist is speaking, ignore him. At best, he has no idea what he's talking about. At worst, he is actively engaged in theft. If they knew what they were talking about, we wouldn't be in this situation, now would we?
- Destroy the Federal Reserve. That private entity is the electrician in the building. It is owned by European bankers, the ones who commissioned the Shoah and 9-11.
- If you make a move to shut down the Federal Reserve, those bankers will call forth their Jewish Drone Army (Israelis) to detonate those weapons that they have placed in various US cities. So your solution must have a military component: You will target Tel Aviv and you will target these European Illuminati bankers.
- Ignore Barack Obama. He --as well as all presidents since 1913-- serves at the pleasure of these bankers. He is less a president than he is presiding over the receivership of the United States to its banker creditors. In exchange for his dutiful services in this regard, they allow him to put his mark on this glorious new society that they have planned. He's not even in the businesses of enforcing the law. He and I both know what he's there for.
"Brrrrrrrrrrr brrr-drrrrrrrrr burr-durrrrrrr! Here I come! Honk honk!"
Yeah.
Well, Mister Obama, there are three hundred million other people in this land who have distinctly different ideas of how their lives should be led. You're just a functionary in a government that doesn't even legally exist. Let's keep things in perspective.
There is only one solution to your current economic CATASTROPHE: Arrest the electrician in the office building, devise a sovereign currency, and ensure non-preferential access to this medium of exchange. Let the economic distortions unwind and start over. It will hurt, make no mistake about that.
IF YOU DO ANYTHING OTHER THAN THIS, MOST ESPECIALLY WHAT ECONOMISTS AND BANKERS RECOMMEND, YOUR CHILDREN WILL KNOW NOTHING BUT THE INSIDE OF A NAZI CAMP. THIS IS NOT HYPERBOLE.
Will you take my advice? Of course you will not. Such a thing takes courage, and that is nothing that we do.
I'm better now.
Are we having economic problems? I shall now weigh in on the matter.
This is not going to be a properly constructed essay because I don't have time for it. Remember: writing is a hobby for me. I have other things to do with my time.
So because this is not a properly constructed essay, it will not contain properly formulated arguments. I will not provide proof to back up my contentions. This essay is essentially my conclusions, which are all I have time to deliver right now. I've been meaning to address this issue for two weeks but didn't have the time. It can't wait any longer, so this is all there is.
The electricians in the office building --bankers-- have imploded your economy on purpose. This is what you get for using as a medium of exchange a privately issued currency, like S&H Green Stamps. They made plenty of stamps available, which fostered the erection of economic endeavors predicated upon the availability of those stamps, then they turned off the availability of stamps. This caused all those endeavors to collapse. All that human activity is now in disarray. Then the bankers come in and buy up the mess at pennies on the dollar. It's the oldest trick in the book. Bankers are thieves in expensive suits.
Let's explain it another way: The electrician in the office building promised 100-amp electrical service to all offices. This availability of electricity caused businesses to rent the offices in that building, knowing that they would have plenty of electricity. They are now dependent upon the services of that electrician. (The one weakness in their business plan, by the way.) That electrician provides power at a discount to the security company in the building. (The guys with guns. The Pentagon. The FBI. The CIA.) So the electrician has guys with guns now. Great. He can forcibly prevent those businesses from hanging an extension cord out the window and getting electricity from some other provider. That electrician can have his guys with guns swoop in and prevent people from using Liberty Dollars as a medium of exchange. The electrician wants those businesses completely dependent on him for their energy.
So: The electrician promised ample service to all businesses in the building. This caused businesses to be launched and people to be hired. Now he cuts off the electricity. (The Financial Attack of 2008.) This causes all economic activity to stop. Businesses go bankrupt because they have no electricity. They go bankrupt, he buys them, he now owns the businesses that he once only provided electricity to. Coup complete.
Men have traded among themselves far longer than governments have even existed. Men traded among themselves long before anyone dreamed of calling himself an economist. Men trade among themselves most efficiently and productively without government or economists.
This is a truism: An economist is not relevant to an economy. He serves no function within it. He does not grow corn and he does not smelt iron ore. He does nothing but observe and make predictions.
But why would anyone ever need to observe the transactions of men and make predictions? The only person interested in observing the economic transactions of men is the thief. He's "casing the joint." He sits quietly and observes why men make the economic decisions they do. He figures out how men will respond if certain changes are made to the environment. (The regulatory environment, in a real-world situation.)
THE ONLY MAN WHO CARES HOW OTHERS TRANSACT AMONG THEMSELVES IS THE MAN WHO SEEKS TO STEAL FROM THEM.
This man is a banker. He hires economists to tell him what regulatory changes must be made in order to produce a certain result, to divert economic energy to a desired end.
Economists are witch doctors in the employ of thieves. That's pretty much all you need to know.
Everything being proposed in Washington right now will only destroy your economy. That is being done on purpose by bankers, through the advice of their witch doctor economists, for the sole purpose of reorganizing your economy to the benefit of those thieving bankers.
This economic stimulus will do absolutely nothing but provide "electricity" to preferred businesses within the office building. All else will be allowed to wither without electricity.
The social and economic structures that will grow on this preferential supply of energy? You don't want to know.
Just envision one gigantic nazi camp.
...because you're dealing with the same financier bankers.
You're dealing with financial terrorists, the same people who commissioned 9-11.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/paulson-was-behind-bailout-martial-law-threat.html
This can be taken two ways, either "If you don't bail out the banks there will be a depression and people will riot and, obviously, there will be martial law to protect the public" or "Do what we say or we'll have our guys with guns reshape your society by force."
You know which one I tend to believe.
Let me make this perfectly clear to you. The bankers shook you down at the threat of having their lackeys in the Pentagon rumble tanks down the street. (The military can't seem to win a war against goat herders, but they're going to prevail against a well-equipped army of some one hundred million. Uh huh.)
Every last banker in New York needs to be hunted down in the street and shot in the head. They're terrorists.
So because this is not a properly constructed essay, it will not contain properly formulated arguments. I will not provide proof to back up my contentions. This essay is essentially my conclusions, which are all I have time to deliver right now. I've been meaning to address this issue for two weeks but didn't have the time. It can't wait any longer, so this is all there is.
The electricians in the office building --bankers-- have imploded your economy on purpose. This is what you get for using as a medium of exchange a privately issued currency, like S&H Green Stamps. They made plenty of stamps available, which fostered the erection of economic endeavors predicated upon the availability of those stamps, then they turned off the availability of stamps. This caused all those endeavors to collapse. All that human activity is now in disarray. Then the bankers come in and buy up the mess at pennies on the dollar. It's the oldest trick in the book. Bankers are thieves in expensive suits.
Let's explain it another way: The electrician in the office building promised 100-amp electrical service to all offices. This availability of electricity caused businesses to rent the offices in that building, knowing that they would have plenty of electricity. They are now dependent upon the services of that electrician. (The one weakness in their business plan, by the way.) That electrician provides power at a discount to the security company in the building. (The guys with guns. The Pentagon. The FBI. The CIA.) So the electrician has guys with guns now. Great. He can forcibly prevent those businesses from hanging an extension cord out the window and getting electricity from some other provider. That electrician can have his guys with guns swoop in and prevent people from using Liberty Dollars as a medium of exchange. The electrician wants those businesses completely dependent on him for their energy.
So: The electrician promised ample service to all businesses in the building. This caused businesses to be launched and people to be hired. Now he cuts off the electricity. (The Financial Attack of 2008.) This causes all economic activity to stop. Businesses go bankrupt because they have no electricity. They go bankrupt, he buys them, he now owns the businesses that he once only provided electricity to. Coup complete.
Men have traded among themselves far longer than governments have even existed. Men traded among themselves long before anyone dreamed of calling himself an economist. Men trade among themselves most efficiently and productively without government or economists.
This is a truism: An economist is not relevant to an economy. He serves no function within it. He does not grow corn and he does not smelt iron ore. He does nothing but observe and make predictions.
But why would anyone ever need to observe the transactions of men and make predictions? The only person interested in observing the economic transactions of men is the thief. He's "casing the joint." He sits quietly and observes why men make the economic decisions they do. He figures out how men will respond if certain changes are made to the environment. (The regulatory environment, in a real-world situation.)
THE ONLY MAN WHO CARES HOW OTHERS TRANSACT AMONG THEMSELVES IS THE MAN WHO SEEKS TO STEAL FROM THEM.
This man is a banker. He hires economists to tell him what regulatory changes must be made in order to produce a certain result, to divert economic energy to a desired end.
Economists are witch doctors in the employ of thieves. That's pretty much all you need to know.
Everything being proposed in Washington right now will only destroy your economy. That is being done on purpose by bankers, through the advice of their witch doctor economists, for the sole purpose of reorganizing your economy to the benefit of those thieving bankers.
This economic stimulus will do absolutely nothing but provide "electricity" to preferred businesses within the office building. All else will be allowed to wither without electricity.
The social and economic structures that will grow on this preferential supply of energy? You don't want to know.
Just envision one gigantic nazi camp.
...because you're dealing with the same financier bankers.
You're dealing with financial terrorists, the same people who commissioned 9-11.
Senator James Inhofe has revealed that Henry Paulson was behind the threats of martial law and a new great depression prior to the passage of the bailout bill, having made such warnings during a conference call on September 19th, around two weeks before the legislation was eventually approved by both the Senate and Congress.
As we reported at the time, on October 2, Democratic Congressman Brad Sherman gave a stunning speech on the House floor during which he decried the fact that, “Many of us were told in private conversations that if we voted against this bill on Monday that the sky would fall, the market would drop two or three thousand points the first day, another couple of thousand the second day, and a few members were even told that there would be martial law in America if we voted no.”
http://www.prisonplanet.com/paulson-was-behind-bailout-martial-law-threat.html
This can be taken two ways, either "If you don't bail out the banks there will be a depression and people will riot and, obviously, there will be martial law to protect the public" or "Do what we say or we'll have our guys with guns reshape your society by force."
You know which one I tend to believe.
Let me make this perfectly clear to you. The bankers shook you down at the threat of having their lackeys in the Pentagon rumble tanks down the street. (The military can't seem to win a war against goat herders, but they're going to prevail against a well-equipped army of some one hundred million. Uh huh.)
Every last banker in New York needs to be hunted down in the street and shot in the head. They're terrorists.
This is the part where I veer into self-indulgence.
It's my own tear-jerking sob story, but it's one that I will tell you anyway. My audience is in no position whatsoever to turn their noses up at whatever material I may deign to deliver. It's a free show, remember?
The only reason I'm posting here on Blogger is because my account at typepad is suspended because I don't have the seventeen dollars or whatever to pay for it for the month. My debit card doesn't work. No money in the account.
I long ago put out of my head the thought of partaking of this New Golden Age of Comedy that is inexorably marching across the earth. So I figured that I could make this endeavor self-sustaining by charging for tickets. It was never my intention to get rich. Paying the bills would have been perfectly adequate.
Let's go through this one more time. This is not a free show. How the (mathematically likely) thousands of people in my audience came to believe that I work for free, I do not know. I have stopped trying to figure it out.
I gave up a very good job three years ago because I knew full well that if I continued at that job that I would stop writing. I don't write for my own benefit; I write for yours. Trust me, I can enjoy the brilliance of my own work without committing it to paper; it's already in my head for my convenient perusal.
Had I remained at that job, my house would now be paid off. Far from being paid off, the mortgage is now one month past due.
It is true that being materially wealthy is quite anathema to the life that I need to lead in order to have the moral authority that I require. For certain moral authority reasons, I need to be of simple means. That's just how the bargain works, and I don't care because my needs are very simple anyway.
I don't know what the issue here is. Is my audience cheap? I don't believe that. If my writing propagates as wide as it appears to, then I find it very difficult to believe that not a single person would see fit to buying a ticket. There appears to be some concerted effort to see that I not get paid. Why? I don't know. Maybe some erroneously believe that it would put me in some kind of legal or political trouble. If that is your concern, forget about it. I can handle myself.
I don't think it's too much to ask for room and board. If I volunteer to help a friend paint his house, I don't expect to get paid. But I do kind of expect a sandwich at lunchtime and a stool to sit on. If I drive a friend to the airport, I don't expect to get paid. But I do kind of expect him to buy the gas burned getting there.
I have a mortgage held by Chittenden Bank, Bellows Falls in the amount of approximately $130,000.
I want it paid off. Figure it out.
And pay it off within a week so that I can derive intelligence from any confirmation or non-confirmation of mortgage retirement at the bank. Because if it's not paid off in a week then that means that no one intends to pay it off at all, which means that I will then know that and I will figure out a way to continue paying the mortgage.
...and I will then also know what caliber of audience I am dealing with. If you refuse to speak to me, that's fine; I WILL figure out a way to make you speak volumes through your inaction.
I am happy to work for you. But you are responsible for my upkeep. Figure it out.
The only reason I'm posting here on Blogger is because my account at typepad is suspended because I don't have the seventeen dollars or whatever to pay for it for the month. My debit card doesn't work. No money in the account.
I long ago put out of my head the thought of partaking of this New Golden Age of Comedy that is inexorably marching across the earth. So I figured that I could make this endeavor self-sustaining by charging for tickets. It was never my intention to get rich. Paying the bills would have been perfectly adequate.
Let's go through this one more time. This is not a free show. How the (mathematically likely) thousands of people in my audience came to believe that I work for free, I do not know. I have stopped trying to figure it out.
I gave up a very good job three years ago because I knew full well that if I continued at that job that I would stop writing. I don't write for my own benefit; I write for yours. Trust me, I can enjoy the brilliance of my own work without committing it to paper; it's already in my head for my convenient perusal.
Had I remained at that job, my house would now be paid off. Far from being paid off, the mortgage is now one month past due.
It is true that being materially wealthy is quite anathema to the life that I need to lead in order to have the moral authority that I require. For certain moral authority reasons, I need to be of simple means. That's just how the bargain works, and I don't care because my needs are very simple anyway.
I don't know what the issue here is. Is my audience cheap? I don't believe that. If my writing propagates as wide as it appears to, then I find it very difficult to believe that not a single person would see fit to buying a ticket. There appears to be some concerted effort to see that I not get paid. Why? I don't know. Maybe some erroneously believe that it would put me in some kind of legal or political trouble. If that is your concern, forget about it. I can handle myself.
I don't think it's too much to ask for room and board. If I volunteer to help a friend paint his house, I don't expect to get paid. But I do kind of expect a sandwich at lunchtime and a stool to sit on. If I drive a friend to the airport, I don't expect to get paid. But I do kind of expect him to buy the gas burned getting there.
I have a mortgage held by Chittenden Bank, Bellows Falls in the amount of approximately $130,000.
I want it paid off. Figure it out.
And pay it off within a week so that I can derive intelligence from any confirmation or non-confirmation of mortgage retirement at the bank. Because if it's not paid off in a week then that means that no one intends to pay it off at all, which means that I will then know that and I will figure out a way to continue paying the mortgage.
...and I will then also know what caliber of audience I am dealing with. If you refuse to speak to me, that's fine; I WILL figure out a way to make you speak volumes through your inaction.
I am happy to work for you. But you are responsible for my upkeep. Figure it out.
Thursday, January 29, 2009
Saturday, January 24, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)